Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.
Cancer Med. 2018 Apr;7(4):1560-1571. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1366. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
Regional hyperthermia is considered to enhance the antitumor effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In this study, we confirmed the efficacy of concomitant radiotherapy, hyperthermia, and chemotherapy (RHC) for neoadjuvant treatment of malignant soft tissue sarcoma (STS). From 1994 to 2013, we performed RHC in 150 patients. This study was limited to 60 patients using the following exclusion criteria: salvage for recurrence or unplanned excision, trunk location, metastasis at initiation, non-STS, and no definitive surgery. As a control group, we collected data from 11,031 patients in the Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Registry in Japan (BSTT). We performed multivariate logistic regression analysis, and propensity scores were created for comparisons between groups. The primary outcome of this study was to compare oncologic outcomes (5-year local control rate [LC] and overall survival rate [OS]). In the RHC group, two local recurrences (3.3%) occurred, and no patients underwent amputation. Margins of definitive surgery were not identical between groups [wide margins (60.0% vs. 85.3%), marginal margins (28.3% vs. 10.5%), and intralesional margins (7.4% vs. 4.2%), RHC and BSTT groups, respectively, P < 0.001]. After adjustment, the difference in OS was not significant between groups (HR = 1.26, P = 0.532); however, a statistically significant difference in LC was observed (HR = 4.82, P = 0.037). RHC resulted in a high LC at 5 years compared to the BSTT group, and amputation was averted in the RHC group, despite the wider margins in the BSTT group. This indicates that less invasive surgery might be achieved with effective neoadjuvant therapy.
区域热疗被认为可以增强化疗和放疗的抗肿瘤作用。在这项研究中,我们证实了同期放化疗、热疗和化疗(RHC)用于恶性软组织肉瘤(STS)新辅助治疗的疗效。1994 年至 2013 年,我们对 150 例患者进行了 RHC。本研究将以下排除标准的 60 例患者作为对照组:复发或计划外切除的挽救治疗、躯干部位、起始时转移、非 STS 以及无确定性手术。作为对照组,我们从日本骨与软组织肿瘤登记处(BSTT)收集了 11031 例患者的数据。我们进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,并为组间比较创建了倾向评分。本研究的主要结局是比较肿瘤学结局(5 年局部控制率[LC]和总生存率[OS])。在 RHC 组中,发生了 2 例局部复发(3.3%),没有患者行截肢术。确定性手术的切缘在两组之间并不完全相同[宽切缘(60.0%对 85.3%)、边缘切缘(28.3%对 10.5%)和肿瘤内切缘(7.4%对 4.2%),RHC 和 BSTT 组,P<0.001]。调整后,两组间 OS 差异无统计学意义(HR=1.26,P=0.532);然而,LC 差异有统计学意义(HR=4.82,P=0.037)。与 BSTT 组相比,RHC 组 5 年 LC 较高,且 RHC 组避免了截肢,尽管 BSTT 组的切缘较宽。这表明,有效的新辅助治疗可能实现侵袭性更小的手术。