Suppr超能文献

医学中的时变训练:理论思考。

Time-Variable Training in Medicine: Theoretical Considerations.

机构信息

O. ten Cate is professor of medical education, Center for Research and Development of Education, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. L.D. Gruppen is professor, Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan. J.R. Kogan is professor of medicine, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. L.A. Lingard is professor, Department of Medicine, and director, Centre for Education Research & Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. P.W. Teunissen is professor, School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands, and maternal fetal medicine specialist, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2018 Mar;93(3S Competency-Based, Time-Variable Education in the Health Professions):S6-S11. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002065.

Abstract

The introduction of competency-based medical education has shifted thinking from a fixed-time model to one stressing attained competencies, independent of the time needed to arrive at those competencies. In this article, the authors explore theoretical and conceptual issues related to time variability in medical training, starting with the Carroll model from the 1960s that put time in the equation of learning. They discuss mastery learning, deliberate practice, and learning curves.While such behaviorist theories apply well to structured courses and highly structured training settings, learning in the clinical workplace is not well captured in such theories or in the model that Carroll proposed. Important in clinical training are self-regulation and motivation; neurocognitive perspectives of time and learning; professional identity formation; and entrustment as an objective of training-all of which may be viewed from the perspective of the time needed to complete training. The authors conclude that, in approaching time variability, the Carroll equation is too simplistic in its application to the breadth of medical training. The equation may be expanded to include variables that determine effective workplace learning, but future work will need to examine the validity of these additional factors.

摘要

从强调达到的能力的基于能力的医学教育的引入转变了思维,从固定时间模式转变为强调达到这些能力所需的时间的模式。在本文中,作者从 20 世纪 60 年代的 Carroll 模型开始,探讨了与医学培训时间可变性相关的理论和概念问题,该模型将时间纳入学习方程。他们讨论了掌握学习、刻意练习和学习曲线。虽然这些行为主义理论很好地适用于结构化课程和高度结构化的培训环境,但在这些理论或 Carroll 提出的模型中,临床工作场所的学习并不能很好地被捕捉到。自我调节和动机;时间和学习的神经认知观点;专业身份形成;以及作为培训目标的委托——所有这些都可以从完成培训所需的时间的角度来看待。作者得出结论,在处理时间可变性时,Carroll 方程在应用于广泛的医学培训时过于简单。该方程可以扩展到包括决定有效工作场所学习的变量,但未来的工作需要检验这些额外因素的有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验