Suppr超能文献

心率、β受体阻滞剂的使用与射血分数降低的心力衰竭结局

Heart rate, beta-blocker use, and outcomes of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Yawkey 5B, Boston, MA, USA.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2019 Jan 1;5(1):3-11. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvy011.

Abstract

AIMS

High resting heart rate (HR ≥70 b.p.m.) is associated with worse clinical outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Heart rate, guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) with beta-blocker (BB), and cardiovascular outcomes were evaluated in a large integrated health network.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using electronic health records we examined patients with chronic HFrEF (ejection fraction ≤35%) in sinus rhythm with at least 1 year of follow-up and available serial HR and medication data between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2014. Among 6071 patients followed for median of 1330 days across 73 586 total visits, median HR remained stable over time with 61.2% of the follow-up period with HR  ≥70 b.p.m. At baseline, 27.9% of patients were on ≥ 50% GDMT target BB dose, 16.2% subjects at baseline, and 19.4% at the end of follow-up had HR ≥70 b.p.m. despite receiving ≥50% of target BB dose. In adjusted analyses, baseline HR was associated with all-cause mortality/heart failure (HF) hospitalization (hazard ratio 1.28 per 15 b.p.m. Heart rate increase; P < 0.001). In comparison, hazard ratio for BB dose was 0.97 (per 77.2 mg increase; P = 0.36). When evaluating patients based on HR and BB dose there was a significant difference in the cumulative hazard for all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization (P < 0.001). For HF hospitalization, hazard appeared to be more closely associated with HR rather than BB dose (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In a real-world analysis, high resting HR was common in HFrEF patients and associated with adverse outcomes. Opportunities exist to improve GDMT and achieve HR control.

摘要

目的

静息心率(HR≥70 次/分)与射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者的临床预后较差相关。本研究在一个大型综合医疗网络中评估了心率、指南指导的药物治疗(GDMT)伴β受体阻滞剂(BB)以及心血管结局。

方法和结果

我们使用电子健康记录,检查了在窦性心律下患有慢性 HFrEF(射血分数≤35%)且至少有 1 年随访且在 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日之间有连续 HR 和药物数据的患者。在 73586 次总就诊中,6071 例患者的中位随访时间为 1330 天,中位 HR 随时间保持稳定,61.2%的随访期 HR≥70 次/分。在基线时,27.9%的患者接受≥50% GDMT 目标 BB 剂量,16.2%的患者在基线时,19.4%的患者在随访结束时尽管接受了≥50%的目标 BB 剂量,但 HR≥70 次/分。在调整后的分析中,基线 HR 与全因死亡率/心力衰竭(HF)住院相关(每增加 15 次/分的 HR 危险比为 1.28;P<0.001)。相比之下,BB 剂量的危险比为 0.97(每增加 77.2mg 为 0.97;P=0.36)。当根据 HR 和 BB 剂量评估患者时,全因死亡率或 HF 住院的累积危险有显著差异(P<0.001)。对于 HF 住院,危险似乎与 HR 而不是 BB 剂量更密切相关(P=0.01)。

结论

在真实世界的分析中,HFrEF 患者的静息 HR 较高且与不良结局相关。有机会改善 GDMT 并实现 HR 控制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验