Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Yawkey 5B, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2019 Jan 1;5(1):3-11. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvy011.
High resting heart rate (HR ≥70 b.p.m.) is associated with worse clinical outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Heart rate, guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) with beta-blocker (BB), and cardiovascular outcomes were evaluated in a large integrated health network.
Using electronic health records we examined patients with chronic HFrEF (ejection fraction ≤35%) in sinus rhythm with at least 1 year of follow-up and available serial HR and medication data between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2014. Among 6071 patients followed for median of 1330 days across 73 586 total visits, median HR remained stable over time with 61.2% of the follow-up period with HR ≥70 b.p.m. At baseline, 27.9% of patients were on ≥ 50% GDMT target BB dose, 16.2% subjects at baseline, and 19.4% at the end of follow-up had HR ≥70 b.p.m. despite receiving ≥50% of target BB dose. In adjusted analyses, baseline HR was associated with all-cause mortality/heart failure (HF) hospitalization (hazard ratio 1.28 per 15 b.p.m. Heart rate increase; P < 0.001). In comparison, hazard ratio for BB dose was 0.97 (per 77.2 mg increase; P = 0.36). When evaluating patients based on HR and BB dose there was a significant difference in the cumulative hazard for all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization (P < 0.001). For HF hospitalization, hazard appeared to be more closely associated with HR rather than BB dose (P = 0.01).
In a real-world analysis, high resting HR was common in HFrEF patients and associated with adverse outcomes. Opportunities exist to improve GDMT and achieve HR control.
静息心率(HR≥70 次/分)与射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者的临床预后较差相关。本研究在一个大型综合医疗网络中评估了心率、指南指导的药物治疗(GDMT)伴β受体阻滞剂(BB)以及心血管结局。
我们使用电子健康记录,检查了在窦性心律下患有慢性 HFrEF(射血分数≤35%)且至少有 1 年随访且在 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日之间有连续 HR 和药物数据的患者。在 73586 次总就诊中,6071 例患者的中位随访时间为 1330 天,中位 HR 随时间保持稳定,61.2%的随访期 HR≥70 次/分。在基线时,27.9%的患者接受≥50% GDMT 目标 BB 剂量,16.2%的患者在基线时,19.4%的患者在随访结束时尽管接受了≥50%的目标 BB 剂量,但 HR≥70 次/分。在调整后的分析中,基线 HR 与全因死亡率/心力衰竭(HF)住院相关(每增加 15 次/分的 HR 危险比为 1.28;P<0.001)。相比之下,BB 剂量的危险比为 0.97(每增加 77.2mg 为 0.97;P=0.36)。当根据 HR 和 BB 剂量评估患者时,全因死亡率或 HF 住院的累积危险有显著差异(P<0.001)。对于 HF 住院,危险似乎与 HR 而不是 BB 剂量更密切相关(P=0.01)。
在真实世界的分析中,HFrEF 患者的静息 HR 较高且与不良结局相关。有机会改善 GDMT 并实现 HR 控制。