Suppr超能文献

系统评价促进积极上学交通的干预措施。

Systematic review of interventions for promoting active school transport.

机构信息

Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, PROFITH "PROmoting FITness and Health through Physical Activity" Research Group, Ctra. de Alfacar, SN, 18070, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, NC 27599-805, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2018 Jun;111:115-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

Abstract

Active commuting to school has been recognized as a potential avenue to increase physical activity in children and adolescents. However, active commuting to school has declined over time, and interventions are needed to reverse this trend. The main aim in the current study was to update a previous systematic review on interventions focused on active travel to school, following the same methodology and addressing the quality and effectiveness of new studies detected in the more recent scientific literature. A systematic review was conducted to identify intervention studies of active commuting to school published from February 2010 to December 2016. Five electronic databases and a manual search were conducted. Detailed information was extracted, including a quantitative assessment comparing the effect sizes, with Cohen's d, and a qualitative assessment using the Evaluation of Public Health Practice Projects tool. We identified 23 interventions that focused on active commuting to school. Among the 23 interventions, three were randomized control trials, 22 had a pre/post design, and 12 used control groups. Most interventions reported a small effect size on active commuting to school (14/23) (d: from -1.45 to 2.37). The quality assessment was rated as weak in most studies (21/23). Government funding continues investing in public policies to promote active commuting to school. However, even though seven years have passed since the last systematic review, research with high quality designs with randomization, greater sample size, and the use of valid and reliable instruments are needed.

摘要

积极的上学通勤方式已被认为是增加儿童和青少年身体活动的一种潜在途径。然而,上学通勤的积极性随着时间的推移而下降,需要采取干预措施来扭转这一趋势。本研究的主要目的是更新之前关于积极上学出行干预的系统评价,使用相同的方法,并针对最近科学文献中发现的新研究的质量和效果进行评估。

我们进行了一项系统评价,以确定从 2010 年 2 月至 2016 年 12 月发表的关于积极上学出行的干预研究。我们进行了五项电子数据库和手动搜索。提取了详细信息,包括定量评估,使用 Cohen 的 d 比较效果大小,以及使用公共卫生实践项目评估工具进行定性评估。我们确定了 23 项专注于积极上学出行的干预措施。在 23 项干预措施中,有 3 项是随机对照试验,22 项有前后设计,12 项使用了对照组。大多数干预措施报道对积极上学出行有较小的效果(14/23)(d:从-1.45 到 2.37)。在大多数研究中,质量评估被评为较弱(21/23)。政府继续投资于公共政策,以促进积极的上学出行。然而,即使自上次系统评价以来已经过去了七年,仍然需要具有随机化、更大样本量和使用有效可靠工具的高质量设计的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验