Reinke Robin E, Enright Tonya, Love Rebecca, Patel Shalizeh A, Ali Ala Omar, Horvath Zsuzsa
Dr. Reinke is Associate Professor, School of Dental Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas; Ms. Enright is Director, Bachelor of Health Science in Dental Hygiene, Allen College; Dr. Love is Assistant Professor of Dental Medicine, College of Dental Medicine, Roseman University of Health Sciences; Dr. Patel is Associate Professor and Director of Simulation, Restorative Dentistry & Prosthodontics, The University of Texas School of Dentistry at Houston; Dr. Ali is Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Tufts University; and Dr. Horvath is Assistant Professor and Director of Faculty Development, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh.
J Dent Educ. 2018 Mar;82(3):286-290. doi: 10.21815/JDE.018.027.
The aim of this preliminary survey study was to determine the perceptions of leaders of dental schools and dental hygiene programs regarding methods of and purposes for conducting students' course evaluations and their role in course improvement, curriculum design, and faculty assessment. A short electronic survey was distributed in 2016 to the academic deans of all 76 dental schools in the U.S. and Canada and a convenience sample of program directors of 232 of the total 332 accredited dental hygiene programs. Individuals from 93 institutions responded for an overall response rate of 30%: 30 of 76 dental schools (39.5% response rate) and 63 of the 232 dental hygiene programs (27% response rate). All of the respondents (100%) reported that their institutions' full-time faculty members were assessed by students in course evaluations for each course and semester they taught. However, only 78% reported that their part-time faculty members were evaluated by students. Course evaluations were mandatory in 62% (n=58) of the responding institutions, with the remaining 38% (n=35) optional. Respondents indicated course directors received the evaluation results for purposes of annual review (n=73, 78%) and instructional review (n=70, 75%). Further investigation of the use and effects of student evaluations is needed to better understand their role in faculty assessment and other aspects of the administration of dental schools and dental hygiene programs.
这项初步调查研究的目的是确定牙科学院和口腔卫生项目负责人对于开展学生课程评估的方法和目的,以及他们在课程改进、课程设计和教师评估中的作用的看法。2016年,一份简短的电子调查问卷被分发给了美国和加拿大所有76所牙科学院的学术院长,以及332个经认可的口腔卫生项目中232个项目主任的便利样本。来自93个机构的人员做出了回应,总体回应率为30%:76所牙科学院中有30所(回应率为39.5%),232个口腔卫生项目中有63个(回应率为27%)。所有受访者(100%)报告称,他们所在机构的全职教师在其所教授的每门课程和每个学期的课程评估中都要接受学生的评估。然而,只有78%的受访者报告称他们的兼职教师接受了学生的评估。在做出回应的机构中,62%(n = 58)的机构规定课程评估是强制性的,其余38%(n = 35)是可选择的。受访者表示,课程主任会收到评估结果,用于年度审查(n = 73,78%)和教学审查(n = 70,75%)。需要对学生评估的使用和效果进行进一步调查,以更好地了解其在教师评估以及牙科学院和口腔卫生项目管理的其他方面所起的作用。