Firouzian Azadeh, Whittington Alex, Searle Graham E, Koychev Ivan, Zamboni Giovanna, Lovestone Simon, Gunn Roger N
Imanova Ltd., Burlington Danes Building, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
EJNMMI Res. 2018 Mar 2;8(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13550-018-0371-y.
AD is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that is associated with the accumulation of two different insoluble protein aggregates, Aβ plaques and hyperphosphorylated tau. This study aimed to investigate the optimal acquisition and quantification of [F]AV45 and [F]AV1451 to image Aβ and tau, respectively, in subjects with AD. Fifteen subjects with early stage AD underwent a T1-weighted structural MRI and two dynamic PET scans to image Aβ (60 min, [F]AV45) and tau (120 min, [F]AV1451). Both dynamic BP and static SUVR outcome measures were calculated and compared for 12 out of 15 subjects who completed 60 min of the Aβ PET scan and at least 110 min of the tau PET scan. The SRTM and reference Logan graphical analysis were applied to the dynamic data to estimate regional BP values and SUVR ratios from the static data. Optimal acquisition windows were explored for both the dynamic and static acquisitions. In addition, the spatial correlation between regional Aβ and tau signals was explored.
Both the SRTM and graphical analysis methods showed a good fit to the dynamic data for both Aβ and tau dynamic PET scans. Mean regional BP estimates became stable 30 min p.i. for [F]AV45 and 80 min p.i. for [F]AV1451. Time stability analysis of static SUVR data showed that the outcome measure starts to become stable for scan windows of 30-50 min p.i. for [F]AV45 and 80-100 min p.i. for [F]AV1451. The results from these time windows correlated well with the results from the full dynamic analysis for both tracers (R = 0.74 for [F]AV45 and R = 0.88 for [F]AV1451). There was a high correlation between amyloid uptake estimate using both dynamic analysis methods in thalamus and tau uptake in thalamus, hippocampus and amygdala.
Short static PET scans at appropriate time windows provided SUVR values which were in reasonable agreement with BP values calculated from dynamic scans using SRTM and reference Logan. These simplified methods may be appropriate for classification and intervention studies, although caution should be employed when considering interventional studies where blood flow and extraction could change.
阿尔茨海默病(AD)是一种进行性神经退行性疾病,与两种不同的不溶性蛋白质聚集体(Aβ斑块和过度磷酸化的tau蛋白)的积累有关。本研究旨在探讨分别使用[F]AV45和[F]AV1451对AD患者的Aβ和tau进行成像时的最佳采集和定量方法。15名早期AD患者接受了T1加权结构MRI检查以及两次动态PET扫描,以分别对Aβ(60分钟,[F]AV45)和tau(120分钟,[F]AV1451)进行成像。对完成60分钟Aβ PET扫描且至少110分钟tau PET扫描的15名患者中的12名,计算并比较了动态BP和静态SUVR结果测量值。将SRTM和参考洛根图形分析应用于动态数据,以从静态数据中估计区域BP值和SUVR比值。探索了动态和静态采集的最佳采集窗口。此外,还探索了区域Aβ和tau信号之间的空间相关性。
SRTM和图形分析方法对Aβ和tau动态PET扫描的动态数据均显示出良好的拟合。对于[F]AV45,平均区域BP估计值在注射后30分钟趋于稳定;对于[F]AV1451,在注射后80分钟趋于稳定。静态SUVR数据的时间稳定性分析表明,对于[F]AV45,扫描窗口在注射后30 - 50分钟时结果测量值开始趋于稳定;对于[F]AV1451,在注射后80 - 100分钟时趋于稳定。这些时间窗口的结果与两种示踪剂的全动态分析结果具有良好的相关性([F]AV45的R = 0.74,[F]AV1451的R = 0.88)。使用两种动态分析方法在丘脑的淀粉样蛋白摄取估计值与丘脑、海马体和杏仁核的tau摄取之间存在高度相关性。
在适当的时间窗口进行短时间静态PET扫描可提供与使用SRTM和参考洛根从动态扫描计算得到的BP值合理一致的SUVR值。这些简化方法可能适用于分类和干预研究,不过在考虑血流和摄取可能发生变化的干预研究时应谨慎使用。