Suppr超能文献

肝细胞癌经动脉化疗栓塞术中的抗生素预防

Antibiotic prophylaxis in transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma.

作者信息

Mansour Mohamed Awad, Khalifa Mohamed Omar

机构信息

Tropical Medicine Department, Ain Shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt.

Tropical Medicine Department, Ain Shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Arab J Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar;19(1):16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajg.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Mar 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Transarterial chemoembolization remains a common treatment option in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. However, protocols for pre- and post-procedure care and the role of antibiotic prophylaxis have not been evaluated. The aim of this work was to compare 3 different groups of prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing chemoembolization and to compare the efficacy of intravenous versus oral route.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

180 hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing transarterial chemoembolization were selected. Patients were classified into 3 groups; Group 1: 60 patients; 30 received intravenous ceftriaxone, and 30 received oral cefixime. Group 2: 60 patients; 30 patients received intravenous levofloxacin and 30 received oral levofloxacin. Group 3: 60 patients; 30 received intravenous ciprofloxacin and 30 received oral ciprofloxacin. All antibiotics were given one day before intervention and for 4 days afterwards. Complete blood count, C-reactive protein, liver and renal function tests were assessed 1 and 5 days and then 1 month after the procedure.

RESULTS

The ciprofloxacin group gave better results than the other 2 groups regarding total and differential leucocytic count and C-reactive protein level. No significant difference was found between oral and intravenous routes among the 3 groups. None of the studied patients developed infections or liver abscess after chemoembolization.

CONCLUSION

Third generation cephalosporin, levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin all are effective as prophylaxis against post-chemoembolization infections. No significant difference between oral and intravenous administration among the 3 groups. Oral ciprofloxacin is an effective, safe and relatively inexpensive prophylaxis regimen.

摘要

背景与研究目的

经动脉化疗栓塞术仍是不可切除肝细胞癌的常见治疗选择。然而,术前和术后护理方案以及抗生素预防的作用尚未得到评估。本研究的目的是比较接受化疗栓塞术患者的3组不同预防性抗生素,并比较静脉途径与口服途径的疗效。

患者与方法

选取180例行经动脉化疗栓塞术的肝细胞癌患者。患者分为3组;第1组:60例患者;30例接受静脉注射头孢曲松,30例接受口服头孢克肟。第2组:60例患者;30例患者接受静脉注射左氧氟沙星,30例接受口服左氧氟沙星。第3组:60例患者;30例接受静脉注射环丙沙星,30例接受口服环丙沙星。所有抗生素均在干预前一天给药,并在之后持续给药4天。在术后1天、5天及1个月时评估血常规、C反应蛋白、肝肾功能。

结果

在白细胞总数、分类计数及C反应蛋白水平方面,环丙沙星组的结果优于其他两组。3组中口服和静脉途径之间未发现显著差异。所有研究患者在化疗栓塞术后均未发生感染或肝脓肿。

结论

第三代头孢菌素、左氧氟沙星或环丙沙星均对预防化疗栓塞术后感染有效。3组中口服和静脉给药之间无显著差异。口服环丙沙星是一种有效、安全且相对便宜的预防方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验