Suppr超能文献

胫骨平台骨折切开复位内固定后支具与不支具的疗效无差异。

No Difference Between Bracing and No Bracing After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Tibial Plateau Fractures.

机构信息

From the Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018 Mar 15;26(6):e134-e141. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00021.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The use of a postoperative brace may be beneficial after open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures. However, bracing has potential drawbacks related to cost, fitting, wound complications, and compliance. We hypothesized that no difference will be found between patients with and without bracing after open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures.

METHODS

In this prospective, comparative trial, patients were randomized to 6 weeks of bracing or no bracing after open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures. Functional, subjective, and radiographic outcomes were recorded. Patients with an open physis, unstable ligamentous injuries, extensor mechanism disruption, and/or <6 months of prospective outcome data were excluded.

RESULTS

The 24 patients with bracing (average age, 50 ± 16 years; 14 women and 10 men) were compared with the 25 patients without bracing (average age, 51 ± 12 years [P = 0.74]; 9 women and 16 men). No statistically significant differences were found in most of the functional, subjective, and radiographic outcomes, including fracture characteristics, complications, postoperative range of motion, Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form scores, and union rates. In the nonbraced group, one patient had late joint collapse with valgus malalignment (>10°). Two wound complications occurred in the braced group and four wound complications occurred in the nonbraced group, but this difference was not statistically significant.

DISCUSSION

Improvements in conventional and locking plate technology have allowed more reliable rigid internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures. However, the use of a brace for postoperative rehabilitation after open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures continues to be debated.

CONCLUSION

Our prospective study showed no statistically significant difference between bracing and no bracing after open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures in terms of functional, subjective, and radiographic outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level II.

摘要

简介

胫骨平台骨折切开复位内固定术后使用支具可能有益。然而,支具有成本、适配、伤口并发症和顺应性等潜在缺点。我们假设胫骨平台骨折切开复位内固定术后使用支具与不使用支具的患者之间不会存在差异。

方法

在这项前瞻性、对照试验中,患者被随机分为胫骨平台骨折切开复位内固定术后 6 周支具固定组和非支具固定组。记录功能、主观和影像学结果。排除开放性骨骺、不稳定的韧带损伤、伸肌装置破坏和/或前瞻性结果数据<6 个月的患者。

结果

24 例支具固定患者(平均年龄 50±16 岁;14 例女性,10 例男性)与 25 例非支具固定患者(平均年龄 51±12 岁[P=0.74];9 例女性,16 例男性)进行了比较。大多数功能、主观和影像学结果,包括骨折特征、并发症、术后活动范围、医疗结局研究 36 项简明健康状况调查问卷评分和愈合率,均无统计学差异。在非支具固定组中,1 例患者发生晚期关节塌陷伴内翻畸形(>10°)。支具固定组发生 2 例伤口并发症,非支具固定组发生 4 例伤口并发症,但差异无统计学意义。

讨论

传统和锁定钢板技术的改进允许更可靠的胫骨平台骨折坚强内固定。然而,胫骨平台骨折切开复位内固定术后使用支具进行康复的做法仍存在争议。

结论

我们的前瞻性研究表明,胫骨平台骨折切开复位内固定术后使用支具与不使用支具在功能、主观和影像学结果方面无统计学差异。

证据等级

治疗性 II 级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验