Suppr超能文献

人乳头瘤病毒 16/18 型基因分型杂交捕获法在宫颈癌筛查初筛中检测人乳头瘤病毒 DNA 的性能:10669 例中国女性的横断面研究。

The performance of human papillomavirus DNA detection with type 16/18 genotyping by hybrid capture in primary test of cervical cancer screening: a cross-sectional study in 10,669 Chinese women.

机构信息

Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Taizhou First People's Hospital, Taizhou, China.

Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Women's Reproductive Health of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Dec;24(12):1322-1327. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.02.027. Epub 2018 Mar 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess the performance of DH3 human papillomavirus (HPV) assay, a newly developed hybrid capture technique that detects 14 high-risk HPVs with type 16/18 genotyping, as a primary test in cervical cancer screening.

METHODS

In total 11,356 Chinese women aged 21-65 years participated in a cervical cancer screening programme using cytology (Thinprep, Hologic) and HPV testing (Cobas 4800 Test, Roche). Residual samples were used to detect HPV by DH3 HPV.

RESULTS

In total 10,669 women with valid results were included in the study. Of those, 135 were diagnosed as CIN2+, and 83 were diagnosed as CIN3+; 1056 women (9.9%) were DH3 HPV-positive and 255 (2.4%) of those were 16/18-positive, while 990 (9.3%) women were Cobas HPV-positive and 243 (2.3%) of those were 16/18-positive. DH3 HPV was non-inferior to Cobas HPV in identifying CIN1- and CIN2+ using predetermined thresholds (both p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of DH3 HPV were 93.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 87.7-96.9), 91.2% (95%CI = 90.6-91.7), 12.0% (95%CI = 10.1-14.1) and 99.9% (95%CI = 99.8-100), respectively, similar to those of Cobas HPV (91.1%, 95%CI = 85.0-5.3; 91.8%, 95%CI = 91.2-92.3; 12.5%, 95%CI = 10.5-14.7; and 99.9%, 95%CI = 99.8-99.9, respectively), in identifying CIN2+ (all p > 0.05). When DH3 HPV and Cobas HPV were respectively used as primary testing in screening strategy, the performance of two strategies were similar in identifying CIN2+. The results were similar in identifying CIN3+.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that DH3 HPV performs similarly to Cobas HPV in identifying high-grade CIN in cervical cancer screening.

摘要

目的

我们旨在评估 DH3 人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测的性能,这是一种新开发的杂交捕获技术,可检测 14 种高危 HPV,并对 16/18 型进行基因分型,作为宫颈癌筛查的初筛方法。

方法

共有 11356 名年龄在 21-65 岁的中国女性参加了一项宫颈癌筛查计划,使用细胞学(Thinprep,Hologic)和 HPV 检测(Cobas 4800 检测,罗氏)。剩余样本用于通过 DH3 HPV 进行 HPV 检测。

结果

共有 10669 名女性的结果有效,其中 135 人被诊断为 CIN2+,83 人被诊断为 CIN3+;1056 名女性(9.9%)DH3 HPV 阳性,其中 255 名(2.4%)为 16/18 阳性,而 990 名女性(9.3%)Cobas HPV 阳性,其中 243 名(2.3%)为 16/18 阳性。DH3 HPV 在识别 CIN1-和 CIN2+方面与 Cobas HPV 具有非劣效性,使用预定阈值(均 p<0.001)。DH3 HPV 的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为 93.3%(95%置信区间 [CI] = 87.7-96.9)、91.2%(95%CI = 90.6-91.7)、12.0%(95%CI = 10.1-14.1)和 99.9%(95%CI = 99.8-100),与 Cobas HPV 相似(91.1%,95%CI = 85.0-5.3;91.8%,95%CI = 91.2-92.3;12.5%,95%CI = 10.5-14.7;99.9%,95%CI = 99.8-99.9),用于识别 CIN2+(均 p>0.05)。当 DH3 HPV 和 Cobas HPV 分别作为筛查策略中的初筛检测时,两种策略在识别 CIN2+方面的性能相似。在识别 CIN3+方面,结果相似。

结论

我们的数据表明,DH3 HPV 在宫颈癌筛查中识别高级别 CIN 方面与 Cobas HPV 表现相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验