Armstrong Ross, Greig Matt
Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Sports Injuries Research Group, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, Lancashire L39 4QP England, United Kingdom.
Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Sports Injuries Research Group, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, Lancashire L39 4QP England, United Kingdom.
Phys Ther Sport. 2018 May;31:15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
Agility is a functional requirement of many sports, challenging stability, and commonly cited as a mechanism of injury. The Functional Movement Screen (FMS) and modified Star Excursion Balance Test (mSEBT) have equivocally been associated with agility performance. The aim of the current study was to establish a hierarchical ordering of FMS and mSEBT elements in predicting T-test agility performance.
Cross-sectional study design.
University.
Thirty-two female rugby players, 31 male rugby players and 39 female netballers MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: FMS, mSEBT, T-test performance.
The predictive potential of composite FMS and mSEBT scores were weaker than when discrete elements were considered. FMS elements were better predictors of T-test performance in rugby players, whilst mSEBT elements better predicted performance in netballers. Hierarchical modelling highlighted the in-line lunge (ILL) as the primary FMS predictor, whereas mSEBT ordering was limb and sport dependent.
The relationship between musculoskeletal screening tools and agility performance was sport-specific. Discrete element scores are advocated over composite scores, and hierarchical ordering of tests might highlight redundancy in screening. The prominence of the ILL in hierarchical modelling might reflect the functional demands of the T-test. Sport-specificity and limb dominance influence hierarchical ordering of musculoskeletal screens.
敏捷性是许多运动的功能需求,对稳定性构成挑战,并且常被认为是损伤的一种机制。功能性动作筛查(FMS)和改良星状偏移平衡测试(mSEBT)与敏捷性表现之间的关联尚不明确。本研究的目的是确定FMS和mSEBT各要素在预测T检验敏捷性表现方面的层次顺序。
横断面研究设计。
大学。
32名女子橄榄球运动员、31名男子橄榄球运动员和39名女子无挡板篮球运动员。主要观察指标:FMS、mSEBT、T检验表现。
FMS和mSEBT综合得分的预测潜力比单独考虑各个要素时要弱。FMS要素对橄榄球运动员的T检验表现是更好的预测指标,而mSEBT要素对无挡板篮球运动员的表现预测更佳。层次模型突出显示直线弓步蹲(ILL)是FMS的主要预测指标,而mSEBT的顺序则取决于肢体和运动项目。
肌肉骨骼筛查工具与敏捷性表现之间的关系具有运动项目特异性。提倡使用单独要素得分而非综合得分,并且测试的层次顺序可能会凸显筛查中的冗余。ILL在层次模型中的突出地位可能反映了T检验的功能需求。运动项目特异性和肢体优势会影响肌肉骨骼筛查的层次顺序。