Chen Xi, Xu Liang, Qiu Yong, Chen Zhong-Hui, Zhou Qing-Shuang, Li Song, Sun Xu
Department of Spine Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Department of Spine Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;114:e293-e300. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.175. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
Clinical and radiographic degenerative spondylolisthesis (CARDS) classification defines a distinct subset of patients with kyphotic angulation at the involved segment (type D). Research using CARDS classification to investigate motion characteristics at involved segments or patient-related outcomes (PROs) following surgical intervention is sparse. We investigated the relationship between CARDS type D spondylolisthesis and dynamic instability and PROs in type D versus non-type D spondylolisthesis.
We reviewed consecutive patients who received transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for L4-5 spondylolisthesis between 2009 and 2015. Patients were assigned into type D and non-type D groups. Translational motion was determined by upright lumbar lateral radiography with supine sagittal magnetic resonance imaging or flexion and extension radiography. Demographics, radiographic parameters, and PROs were evaluated.
Type D and non-type D groups comprised 34 and 163 patients, respectively. Compared with non-type D, type D group was characterized by lordotic angulation loss and higher degree of olisthesis on upright radiographs and demonstrated higher translational motion on upright lumbar lateral radiography with supine sagittal magnetic resonance imaging analysis. After surgery, mean reduction rate was significantly higher in type D group; type D had less slippage, but differences in slip angle and disc height were not significant. Preoperative Oswestry Disability Index and visual analog scale for back pain scores were higher in type D group. Type D spondylolisthesis and dynamic instability were associated with achieving minimal clinically important differences in PROs.
CARDS type D spondylolisthesis is a distinct subset associated with dynamic instability and worse PROs. Higher improvement in PROs can be achieved in CARDS type D spondylolisthesis after surgery.
临床与影像学退变性腰椎滑脱(CARDS)分类定义了受累节段存在后凸成角的特定患者亚组(D型)。利用CARDS分类来研究手术干预后受累节段的运动特征或患者相关结局(PROs)的研究较少。我们研究了CARDS D型腰椎滑脱与动态不稳定之间的关系,以及D型与非D型腰椎滑脱患者的PROs情况。
我们回顾了2009年至2015年间因L4-5腰椎滑脱接受经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的连续患者。将患者分为D型和非D型组。通过站立位腰椎侧位X线片结合仰卧位矢状面磁共振成像或屈伸位X线片来确定平移运动。评估患者的人口统计学特征、影像学参数和PROs。
D型组和非D型组分别有34例和163例患者。与非D型组相比,D型组在站立位X线片上表现为前凸角丢失和滑脱程度更高,在站立位腰椎侧位X线片结合仰卧位矢状面磁共振成像分析中显示出更高的平移运动。手术后,D型组的平均复位率显著更高;D型组的滑脱程度较小,但滑脱角和椎间盘高度的差异不显著。术前,D型组的Oswestry功能障碍指数和背痛视觉模拟评分更高。D型腰椎滑脱和动态不稳定与PROs达到最小临床重要差异相关。
CARDS D型腰椎滑脱是一个与动态不稳定和更差PROs相关的独特亚组。CARDS D型腰椎滑脱术后PROs可实现更高程度的改善。