Suppr超能文献

慢性血液透析患者植入皮下心脏复律除颤器时的透析间隔及心电图筛查时机

Dialytic interval and the timing of electrocardiographic screening for subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator placement in chronic hemodialysis patients.

作者信息

You Cindy, Sharma Shishir, Bavishi Aakash, Groh Christopher A, Alia Yazan, Saour Basil, Passman Rod

机构信息

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 420 E. Superior St, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.

Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Jul;52(2):179-184. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0343-1. Epub 2018 Mar 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hemodialysis (HD) patients have a high risk of sudden death but limited vascular access and high complication rates from transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). Subcutaneous ICDs (S-ICD) may be an alternative, but dynamic ECG changes may result in inappropriate shocks. This study aims to define the screen failure rate for S-ICD in patients pre- and post-HD.

METHODS

ECG waveforms were obtained using electrodes mimicking the S-ICD sensing vectors in an unselected test group of chronic HD patients and a control group of ICD-eligible non-dialysis patients. Participants passed screening if their QRS and T-waves fit within the screening template in supine and standing positions in any lead. Test group participants were screened before and after HD and control group patients were screened at two separate time points. HD patients were stratified into the four following groups: (A) passed screening before and after HD, (B) failed screening before but passed after HD, (C) passed screening before but failed after HD, and (D) failed screening before and after HD. Patients in group A passed the screening for ICD implantation, and patients in groups B, C, and D failed the screening for ICD implantation. Control patients were similarly classified by pass/fail status at the two assessment points.

RESULTS

Of the 76 patients enrolled, 51 were HD patients and 25 were controls. Of the 51 HD patients, 43 (84%) were in group A, four participants (8%) were in group B, one (2%) was in group C, and three participants (6%) were in group D. There were no differences in any of the clinical or demographic variables between the pass and fail test HD groups. None of the 25 controls failed the screening at either time point (p = 0.047 vs HD patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, HD patients were more likely to fail S-ICD screening compared to non-HD patients (16 v 0%, p = 0.047) and are more likely to do so prior to HD. Patients on HD should be screened at multiple time points around the dialytic interval to reduce the risk of inappropriate shocks.

摘要

背景

血液透析(HD)患者猝死风险高,但经静脉植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)的血管通路有限且并发症发生率高。皮下ICD(S-ICD)可能是一种替代方案,但动态心电图变化可能导致不适当电击。本研究旨在确定HD患者透析前后S-ICD的筛查失败率。

方法

在未选择的慢性HD患者测试组和符合ICD植入条件的非透析患者对照组中,使用模拟S-ICD感知向量的电极获取心电图波形。如果参与者在任何导联的仰卧位和站立位时QRS波和T波符合筛查模板,则通过筛查。测试组参与者在HD前后进行筛查,对照组患者在两个不同时间点进行筛查。HD患者分为以下四组:(A)HD前后均通过筛查;(B)HD前筛查失败但HD后通过;(C)HD前通过筛查但HD后失败;(D)HD前后筛查均失败。A组患者通过ICD植入筛查,B、C、D组患者未通过ICD植入筛查。对照组患者在两个评估点也根据通过/失败状态进行类似分类。

结果

在纳入的76例患者中,51例为HD患者,25例为对照组。在51例HD患者中,43例(84%)属于A组,4例参与者(8%)属于B组,1例(2%)属于C组,3例参与者(6%)属于D组。通过和未通过测试的HD组之间的任何临床或人口统计学变量均无差异。25例对照组患者在两个时间点均未筛查失败(与HD患者相比,p = 0.047)。

结论

总体而言,与非HD患者相比,HD患者更有可能筛查S-ICD失败(16%对0%,p = 0.047),且在HD前更有可能失败。HD患者应在透析间隔的多个时间点进行筛查,以降低不适当电击的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验