Abouelnour Amr Ei, Doyle Mark, Thompson Diane V, Yamrozik June, Williams Ronald B, Shah Moneal B, Soma Siva Kr, Murali Srinivas, Benza Raymond L, Biederman Robert Ww
Department of Cardiovascular MRI Clinical and Research Program, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Cardiol Res Cardiovasc Med. 2017;2017(1). Epub 2017 Jan 11.
Investigate the impact of Right Ventricular (RV) Internal Work (IW), ratio of arterial to ventricular end-systolic elastance (E/E), and RV Insertion Point (IP) Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE) on outcome in Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) patients.
LGE is well known to be present within the RVIPs and Inter Ventricular Septum (IVS) in PH patients, but its prognostic role remains complex and potentially overestimated via 2D qualitative relative to the 3D quantitative measures now available. However, E/E, a measure of ventricular-arterial coupling and IW, when added to external cardiac work i.e. the P-V loop area as correlates to the heart's energy demands, might fundamentally improve measures of prognosis as they interrogate physiology beyond just the RV.
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMR) of 124 PH patients (age = 60±13, 85F) referred to a large tertiary PH center, was retrospectively examined for RV volumetric and functional indices and RVIP LGE%. Right Heart Catheterizations (RHC) performed within 1±2 months of the CMR were reviewed. E/E was derived as RV End-Systolic Volume (ESV/RVSV). IW was estimated as RVESV ×(RV end-systolic pressure-RV diastolic pressure). Patients were followed from date of CMR for up to 5 years for MACE (death, hospitalized RV failure, initiation of parenteral prostacyclin, sustained ventricular arrhythmia or referral for lung transplantation).
MACE was high; 48/124 (39%) patients had MACE by 1.6±1.3 years. Neither RVIP nor IVS LGE using visual assessment or even 3D quantization predicted MACE. The strongest predictor of MACE was RVIW (OR=1.00013, p<0.002), vs. mPAP, RV mass, RV EF and IP LGE.
Surprisingly, neither a single time-point RVIP nor whole IVS LGE% can predict outcome in the largest cohort of PH patients studied to date when compared with conventional or contemporary metrics of disease progression. CMR-LGE appears to lose its' prognostic value in PH patients in stark contradistinction to all other left and right-sided human myocardial pathologies.
研究右心室(RV)内功(IW)、动脉与心室收缩末期弹性比值(E/E)以及右心室插入点(IP)延迟钆增强(LGE)对肺动脉高压(PH)患者预后的影响。
众所周知,PH患者的右心室插入点和室间隔(IVS)存在LGE,但其预后作用仍很复杂,相对于目前可用的三维定量测量,通过二维定性评估其预后作用可能被高估。然而,E/E作为心室-动脉耦合和IW的一种测量指标,当与外部心脏功(即P-V环面积,与心脏能量需求相关)相加时,可能会从根本上改善预后评估,因为它们不仅能研究右心室,还能探究生理学其他方面。
对转诊至一家大型三级PH中心的124例PH患者(年龄=60±13岁,85例女性)进行心脏磁共振成像(CMR)检查,回顾性分析右心室容积和功能指标以及右心室插入点LGE%。对在CMR检查后1±2个月内进行的右心导管检查(RHC)进行回顾。E/E通过右心室收缩末期容积(ESV/RVSV)得出。IW通过右心室收缩末期容积×(右心室收缩末期压力-右心室舒张末期压力)估算。从CMR检查日期开始对患者进行长达5年的随访,观察主要不良心血管事件(MACE,包括死亡、因右心室衰竭住院、开始使用肠外前列环素、持续性室性心律失常或转诊进行肺移植)。
MACE发生率较高;48/124例(39%)患者在1.6±1.3年时发生MACE。无论是通过视觉评估还是三维量化得出的右心室插入点或室间隔LGE,均无法预测MACE。MACE的最强预测指标是右心室IW(OR=1.00013,p<0.002),与平均肺动脉压、右心室质量、右心室射血分数和插入点LGE相比。
令人惊讶的是,与疾病进展的传统或当代指标相比,在迄今为止研究的最大队列的PH患者中,单次时间点的右心室插入点LGE或整个室间隔LGE%均无法预测预后。与所有其他左右心室心肌病变形成鲜明对比的是,CMR-LGE在PH患者中似乎失去了其预后价值。