Suppr超能文献

血管腔内腹主动脉修复术后的晚期开放转换:20年经验

Late open conversion after endovascular abdominal aortic repair: a 20-year experience.

作者信息

Joo Hyun-Chel, Lee Seung-Hyun, Chang Byung-Chul, Lee Sak, Yoo Kyung-Jong, Youn Young-Nam

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea.

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea -

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2019 Feb;60(1):73-80. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.18.10173-X. Epub 2018 Mar 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the increasing use of endovascular aortic repair, secondary interventions after aortic stent grafting remain a concern. We retrospectively reviewed open conversion cases with complications following endovascular abdominal aortic repair (EVAR).

METHODS

EVAR due to infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) was performed in 566 patients between January 1994 and May 2015. A retrospective review of EVAR requiring late open conversion (>1 month after implant) was conducted. Patient demographics, reasons for conversion, operative techniques, operative outcomes, and late survival were reviewed.

RESULTS

Thirty of these patients (5.3%) required late conversion to open repair. The median interval to open conversion after EVAR was 48.6 months (range: 2-190 months). Indications of open conversion included type I endoleak (N.=10), stent fracture (N.=4), type V endoleak (N.=4), stent graft infection (N.=4), stent limb obstruction (N.=3), stent migration (N.=3), and type II endoleak (N.=2). Twenty-four operations were elective, and six operations (20%) were emergent due to aneurysm rupture. Compete endograft removal was performed in 14 patients (46.6%) and 16 endografts were partially left in situ. The hospital mortality rate was 10% (3/30) overall, 33.3% in the emergency group and 0% the elective group (P=0.03). Overall survival rate at a mean follow-up of 35 months was 80.7%, with a tendency towards lower survival rate after emergency compared with elective open conversion (89.3% vs. 44.4%; P=0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Open conversion due to late complications after EVAR seems to be a lifesaving procedure with acceptable initial and mid-term outcomes. Elective conversion has better outcomes compared to those in an emergency setting. Therefore, lifelong surveillance is warranted, and an early decision for open conversion, if indicated, is necessary to achieve the best outcomes.

摘要

背景

随着血管内主动脉修复术的使用增加,主动脉支架植入后的二次干预仍然是一个问题。我们回顾性分析了血管内腹主动脉修复术(EVAR)后出现并发症的开放转换病例。

方法

1994年1月至2015年5月期间,566例患者因肾下腹主动脉瘤(AAA)接受了EVAR。对需要晚期开放转换(植入后>1个月)的EVAR进行回顾性分析。回顾了患者的人口统计学资料、转换原因、手术技术、手术结果和晚期生存率。

结果

其中30例患者(5.3%)需要晚期转换为开放修复。EVAR后至开放转换的中位间隔时间为48.6个月(范围:2-190个月)。开放转换的指征包括I型内漏(n=10)、支架断裂(n=4)、V型内漏(n=4)、支架移植物感染(n=4)、支架肢体阻塞(n=3)、支架移位(n=3)和II型内漏(n=2)。24例手术为择期手术,6例手术(20%)因动脉瘤破裂而急诊。14例患者(46.6%)进行了完全移除血管内移植物,16个血管内移植物部分留在原位。总体医院死亡率为10%(3/30),急诊组为33.3%,择期组为0%(P=0.03)。平均随访35个月时的总体生存率为80.7%,与择期开放转换相比,急诊开放转换后的生存率有降低趋势(89.3%对44.4%;P=0.06)。

结论

EVAR术后晚期并发症导致的开放转换似乎是一种挽救生命的手术,具有可接受的初期和中期结果。与急诊情况相比,择期转换的结果更好。因此,有必要进行终身监测,如有指征,尽早决定开放转换以获得最佳结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验