Department of Health Sciences and Kinesiology, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro.
J Athl Train. 2018 Apr;53(4):404-409. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-84-17. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
An estimated 15.3 million adolescent students are enrolled in US high schools, with approximately 7.8 million participating in athletics. Researchers have examined various demographics in high school athletes; however, athletic participation may play a larger role in test performance than previously thought. Currently, investigations of concussion assessment may rely on uninjured athletes as controls. However, due to the intense nature of athletics, this may not be an appropriate practice.
To examine differences between athletes and nonathletes using a common computerized neuropsychological test.
Retrospective cross-sectional study.
High schools from a school district in Columbus, Ohio.
A total of 662 adolescent high school students (athletes: n = 383, female n = 18; nonathletes: n = 279, female n = 193).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Participants were administered a computerized neuropsychological test battery (Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Test [ImPACT]) during baseline concussion assessment. Differences between groups were established for output composite scores.
Differences were found between athletes and nonathletes in composite reaction time ( F = 14.855, P < .001) and total symptom score ( F = 33.770, P < .001). Nonathletes reported more symptoms, whereas athletes had faster reaction times. No differences were present in composite verbal memory, composite visual memory, composite visual motor speed, or composite impulse control ( P > .05).
Symptom reporting and reaction time differed between high school athletes and nonathletes. Participation in extracurricular activities may lead to cognitive differences in adolescents that can influence performance on the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Test battery. Researchers should account for these differences in baseline performance when making concussion diagnostic and management decisions.
在美国的高中,约有 1530 万名青少年学生入学,其中约有 780 万人参加体育运动。研究人员已经研究了高中生的各种人口统计学特征;然而,与之前的想法相比,运动参与可能在考试成绩中发挥更大的作用。目前,对脑震荡评估的研究可能依赖于未受伤的运动员作为对照组。然而,由于运动的激烈性质,这可能不是一种合适的做法。
使用常见的计算机化神经心理学测试检查运动员和非运动员之间的差异。
回顾性横断面研究。
俄亥俄州哥伦布市一个学区的高中。
共有 662 名青少年高中生(运动员:n = 383,女性 n = 18;非运动员:n = 279,女性 n = 193)。
参与者在基线脑震荡评估期间接受了计算机化神经心理学测试(即时脑震荡后评估和认知测试[ImPACT])。对两组之间的输出综合评分差异进行了建立。
在综合反应时间( F = 14.855, P <.001)和总症状评分( F = 33.770, P <.001)方面,运动员和非运动员之间存在差异。非运动员报告的症状更多,而运动员的反应时间更快。在综合言语记忆、综合视觉记忆、综合视觉运动速度或综合冲动控制方面没有差异( P >.05)。
高中生运动员和非运动员在症状报告和反应时间方面存在差异。课外活动的参与可能导致青少年的认知差异,从而影响即时脑震荡后评估和认知测试电池的表现。在做出脑震荡诊断和管理决策时,研究人员应考虑到这些基线表现的差异。