Suppr超能文献

坐在哪里?坐姿类型对弗雷明汉心血管风险评分很重要。

Where to Sit? Type of Sitting Matters for the Framingham Cardiovascular Risk Score.

作者信息

Wennman Heini, Vasankari Tommi, Borodulin Katja

机构信息

National Institute for Health and Welfare, PO Box 30, FI-00271 Helsinki, Finland.

UKK-Institute for Research and Health Promotion, PO Box 30, FI-33501 Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

AIMS Public Health. 2016 Aug 15;3(3):577-591. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.3.577. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current evidence on associations of type-specific sedentary behavior with cardiovascular disease (CVD) is limited to mainly screen-time sedentary behavior (SB). We aimed to study the associations of type-specific and total time spent sitting with the Framingham 10-year cardiovascular disease risk score (Framingham score) in Finnish adults.

METHODS

Data comprise the National FINRISK 2007 and 2012 health examination surveys with 10,185 participants aged 25-74 years, apparently free of CVD. Participants reported average daily time spent sitting in different locations: work-related sitting, at home in front of television (TV), at home in front of computer, in a vehicle, and elsewhere. Total SB time was calculated from these context-specific self-reports. Accelerometer-based sedentary time was assessed in 988 FINRISK 2012 participants. Framingham score was calculated using information on blood pressure and its medication, cholesterol levels, age, diabetes status, and smoking. Analyses were adjusted for age, study year, education, employment status, leisure time physical activity, and body mass index.

RESULTS

Out of several type-specific sitting behaviors, only TV sitting showed systematic associations with the Framingham score in both genders. The lowest Framingham risk was found for TV sitting from 6 minutes to less than 1 hour daily. Of other types of sitting, computer sitting was inversely associated with the Framingham risk in men only. Total self-reported sitting time did not show significant associations with the Framingham score, but instead higher objectively assessed sedentary time showed higher Framingham risk in men.

CONCLUSIONS

TV sitting showed most systematic associations with CVD risk score. This suggests that of all types of SB, reducing TV sitting should be targeted for reducing CVD risk.

摘要

背景

目前关于特定类型久坐行为与心血管疾病(CVD)关联的证据主要局限于屏幕时间久坐行为(SB)。我们旨在研究芬兰成年人中特定类型久坐行为及总久坐时间与弗雷明汉10年心血管疾病风险评分(弗雷明汉评分)之间的关联。

方法

数据来自2007年和2012年全国FINRISK健康检查调查,共有10185名年龄在25 - 74岁之间、显然无心血管疾病的参与者。参与者报告了在不同地点平均每天久坐的时间:与工作相关的久坐、在家看电视、在家使用电脑、在车内以及其他地方。总久坐时间根据这些特定情境的自我报告计算得出。在988名FINRISK 2012参与者中评估了基于加速度计的久坐时间。弗雷明汉评分通过血压及其用药情况、胆固醇水平、年龄、糖尿病状态和吸烟等信息计算得出。分析对年龄、研究年份、教育程度、就业状况、休闲时间身体活动和体重指数进行了调整。

结果

在几种特定类型的久坐行为中,只有看电视久坐与男女的弗雷明汉评分均呈现出系统性关联。每天看电视久坐6分钟至不到1小时的人群,其弗雷明汉风险最低。在其他类型的坐立行为中,仅在男性中,使用电脑久坐与弗雷明汉风险呈负相关。自我报告的总久坐时间与弗雷明汉评分未显示出显著关联,但在男性中,客观评估的久坐时间越长,弗雷明汉风险越高。

结论

看电视久坐与心血管疾病风险评分呈现出最系统性的关联。这表明在所有类型的久坐行为中,减少看电视久坐应作为降低心血管疾病风险的目标。

相似文献

1
Where to Sit? Type of Sitting Matters for the Framingham Cardiovascular Risk Score.
AIMS Public Health. 2016 Aug 15;3(3):577-591. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.3.577. eCollection 2016.
2
Associations of context-specific sitting time with markers of cardiometabolic risk in Australian adults.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Nov 20;15(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0748-3.
7
Daily Sedentary Time and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: The National FINRISK 2002 Study.
J Phys Act Health. 2015 Jul;12(7):904-8. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2013-0364. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
9
Objectively-Assessed Patterns and Reported Domains of Sedentary Behavior Among Japanese Older Adults.
J Epidemiol. 2019 Sep 5;29(9):334-339. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20180041. Epub 2018 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

5
Sedentary Behaviour and Its Relationship with Early Vascular Ageing in the General Spanish Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 29;19(9):5450. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095450.
8
Objective and subjective measurement of sedentary behavior in human adults: A toolkit.
Am J Hum Biol. 2022 Jan;34(1):e23546. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23546. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
9
Editorial for Special Issue: Advances in Sedentary Behavior Research and Translation.
AIMS Public Health. 2017 Jan 18;4(1):33-37. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2017.1.33. eCollection 2017.
10
Use of Global Risk Score for Cardiovascular Evaluation of Rural Workers in Southern Brazil.
ScientificWorldJournal. 2018 Mar 18;2018:3818065. doi: 10.1155/2018/3818065. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

3
Associations of Total and Domain-Specific Sedentary Time With Type 2 Diabetes in Taiwanese Older Adults.
J Epidemiol. 2016 Jul 5;26(7):348-54. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20150095. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
5
Relationship Between Sedentary Behavior and Cardiovascular Risk.
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016 Jan;18(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s11886-015-0678-5.
6
Adverse associations of car time with markers of cardio-metabolic risk.
Prev Med. 2016 Feb;83:26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.11.029. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
8
Patterns of Sedentary Behavior in US Middle-Age and Older Adults: The REGARDS Study.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Mar;48(3):430-8. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000792.
9
Associations of sitting behaviours with all-cause mortality over a 16-year follow-up: the Whitehall II study.
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;44(6):1909-16. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv191. Epub 2015 Oct 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验