a Mansbach Health Tools , LLC , Simpsonville , MD , United States.
Aging Ment Health. 2019 Jun;23(6):718-726. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2018.1450838. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
The clinical assessment of older adults' judgment is important for mitigating safety risks that often precipitate loss of independence. Our national survey of geriatric healthcare providers (N = 496; M years of experience = 17.11 ± 10.60) indicated that formal judgment tests are underutilized in clinical practice. We developed the Verbal Test of Practical Judgment (VPJ) as a new test of judgment for older adults intended to identify difficulty performing instrumental activities of daily living (IADL).
In two prospective studies, participants were long-term care facility residents (age ≥ 50) in Maryland, USA (Study 1, N = 51; Study 2, N = 110) referred to licensed psychologists for neuro-cognitive and mood evaluation by facility attending physicians. Psychometric analyses were performed to examine the construct validity of the VPJ.
The VPJ evidenced adequate reliability and strong construct validity across both studies. Receiver operating characteristic analysis yielded an optimal VPJ cut score for identifying impaired judgment. The VPJ significantly predicted IADL performance beyond clinician and participant ratings.
The VPJ appears to be a valid tool for assessing judgment among older adults with suspected cognitive impairment. VPJ score inferences can inform clinicians on the odds of requiring assistance for specific IADLs.
评估老年人的判断能力对于降低可能导致独立性丧失的安全风险非常重要。我们对老年医疗保健提供者(N=496;M 年工作经验=17.11±10.60)进行的全国性调查表明,在临床实践中,正式的判断测试并未得到充分利用。我们开发了实用判断口头测试(VPJ),作为一种新的老年人判断测试,旨在识别执行日常工具性活动(IADL)的困难。
在两项前瞻性研究中,参与者为美国马里兰州的长期护理机构居民(年龄≥50 岁)(研究 1,N=51;研究 2,N=110),由机构主治医生转介给持照心理学家进行神经认知和情绪评估。进行了心理计量学分析,以检验 VPJ 的结构效度。
在两项研究中,VPJ 均表现出足够的可靠性和较强的结构效度。受试者工作特征分析得出了一个用于识别判断受损的最佳 VPJ 截断分数。VPJ 显著预测了 IADL 表现,超过了临床医生和参与者的评分。
VPJ 似乎是一种评估疑似认知障碍的老年人判断能力的有效工具。VPJ 评分推断可以为临床医生提供有关特定 IADL 需要帮助的可能性的信息。