Department of Psychology, Yale University, 2 Hillhouse Avenue, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Department of Psychology, Yale University, 2 Hillhouse Avenue, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;22(4):280-293. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
It is often said that there are two types of psychological processes: one that is intentional, controllable, conscious, and inefficient, and another that is unintentional, uncontrollable, unconscious, and efficient. Yet, there have been persistent and increasing objections to this widely influential dual-process typology. Critics point out that the 'two types' framework lacks empirical support, contradicts well-established findings, and is internally incoherent. Moreover, the untested and untenable assumption that psychological phenomena can be partitioned into two types, we argue, has the consequence of systematically thwarting scientific progress. It is time that we as a field come to terms with these issues. In short, the dual-process typology is a convenient and seductive myth, and we think cognitive science can do better.
人们常说,心理过程有两种类型:一种是有意的、可控的、有意识的和低效的,另一种是无意的、不可控的、无意识的和高效的。然而,这种广泛影响的双重加工类型学一直存在着持续且不断增加的反对意见。批评者指出,“两种类型”框架缺乏经验支持,与既定的发现相矛盾,并且在内部不一致。此外,我们认为,未经检验和站不住脚的假设,即心理现象可以分为两种类型,其结果是系统地阻碍了科学的进步。我们作为一个领域,是时候面对这些问题了。简而言之,双重加工类型学是一个方便且诱人的神话,我们认为认知科学可以做得更好。