Division of Radiology, Department of Imaging and Medical Informatics, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Center for Magnetic Resonance in Biology and Medicine, Aix-Marseille Medical University, Marseille, France.
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Apr;101:162-169. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.02.026. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
To determine the diagnostic performance of morphologic MRI with diffusion weighted imaging (DWIMRI) for the detection of post-treatment lymph node (LN) recurrence of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).
This retrospective study is based on 33 HNSCC patients who underwent DWIMRI with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements for suspected post-treatment loco-regional failure. Two radiologists, blinded to clinical/histopathological data, analyzed MR images according to established morphologic criteria and measured ADC values by drawing regions of interest on each normal/abnormal looking lymph node (LN). Histopathological findings in 40 neck dissections, 133 LN-levels and 755 LNs served as gold standard.
Malignant LNs had lower ADCmean values than benign LNs (1.15 ± 0.35 × 10 mm/s versus 1.28 ± 0.28 × 10 mm/s, p = .028). The optimal ADCmean threshold to differentiate malignant from benign LNs was 1.1695 × 10 mm/s. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values (95%CI in parentheses) of DWIMRI with morphologic criteria and ADCmean <1.1695 × 10 mm/s were: (a) 100%(86.2;100), 44.4%(15.3;77.3), 86.1%(69.7;94.7), and 100%(39.5;100) per neck dissection; (b) 83.6%(69.7;92.2), 91.6%(83.0;96.2), 85.4%(71.6;93.4), and 90.5%(81.7;95.5) per LN-level; (c) 53.1%(43.5;62.4), 95.5%(93.5;96.9), 67.4%(56.6;76.7), and 92.0%(89.6;93.9) per LN, respectively.
The high NPV of DWIMRI irrespective of analysis type (per neck dissection/per neck level/per lymph node) make it a useful follow-up tool after treatment.
评估形态学 MRI 联合扩散加权成像(DWIMRI)检测头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)治疗后淋巴结(LN)复发的诊断性能。
本回顾性研究纳入了 33 例疑似治疗后局部区域复发的 HNSCC 患者,所有患者均行 DWIMRI 检查并测量表观扩散系数(ADC)。两位放射科医生对 MRI 图像进行分析,根据既定的形态学标准进行评估,并对每个正常/异常的淋巴结(LN)进行感兴趣区(ROI)勾画以测量 ADC 值。40 次颈部解剖、133 个 LN 水平和 755 个 LN 的组织病理学检查结果作为金标准。
恶性 LN 的 ADCmean 值低于良性 LN(1.15±0.35×10mm/s 比 1.28±0.28×10mm/s,p=0.028)。区分恶性 LN 和良性 LN 的最佳 ADCmean 阈值为 1.1695×10mm/s。形态学标准联合 ADCmean<1.1695×10mm/s 的 DWIMRI 诊断效能为:(a)颈部解剖的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)(括号内为 95%置信区间)分别为 100%(86.2;100)、44.4%(15.3;77.3)、86.1%(69.7;94.7)和 100%(39.5;100);(b)LN 水平的敏感度、特异度、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 83.6%(69.7;92.2)、91.6%(83.0;96.2)、85.4%(71.6;93.4)和 90.5%(81.7;95.5);(c)LN 的敏感度、特异度、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 53.1%(43.5;62.4)、95.5%(93.5;96.9)、67.4%(56.6;76.7)和 92.0%(89.6;93.9)。
DWIMRI 的高 NPV 使其成为治疗后一种有用的随访工具,无论分析类型(颈部解剖、颈部水平、淋巴结)如何,其结果均具有较高的可信度。