Suppr超能文献

跨诊断模型的负性情绪:RDoC、DSM-5 第三部分和 FFM。

Negative emotionality across diagnostic models: RDoC, DSM-5 Section III, and FFM.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky.

出版信息

Personal Disord. 2018 Mar;9(2):155-164. doi: 10.1037/per0000273.

Abstract

The research domain criteria (RDoC) were established in an effort to explore underlying dimensions that cut across many existing disorders and to provide an alternative to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). One purpose of the present study was to suggest a potential alignment of RDoC negative valence with 2 other dimensional models of negative emotionality: five-factor model (FFM) neuroticism and the DSM-5 Section III negative affectivity. A second purpose of the study, though, was to compare their coverage of negative emotionality, more specifically with respect to affective instability. Participants were adult community residents (N = 90) currently in mental health treatment. Participants received self-report measures of RDoC negative valence, FFM neuroticism, and DSM-5 Section III negative affectivity, along with measures of affective instability, borderline personality disorder, and impairment. Findings suggested that RDoC negative valence is commensurate with FFM neuroticism and DSM-5 Section III negative affectivity, and it would be beneficial if it was expanded to include affective instability. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

研究领域标准(RDoC)的建立是为了探索跨越许多现有障碍的潜在维度,并为精神障碍诊断与统计手册第五版(DSM-5)提供替代方案。本研究的目的之一是建议 RDoC 负性效价与另外两个负性情感的维度模型:五因素模型(FFM)神经质和 DSM-5 第三节负性情感的潜在一致性。然而,研究的第二个目的是比较它们对负性情感的涵盖范围,特别是在情感不稳定方面。参与者为成年社区居民(N=90),目前正在接受心理健康治疗。参与者接受了 RDoC 负性效价、FFM 神经质和 DSM-5 第三节负性情感的自我报告测量,以及情感不稳定、边缘性人格障碍和损伤的测量。研究结果表明,RDoC 负性效价与 FFM 神经质和 DSM-5 第三节负性情感一致,如果将其扩展到包括情感不稳定,将是有益的。(PsycINFO 数据库记录

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验