van Prooijen Jan-Willem, Krouwel André P M, Emmer Julia
Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
The Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2018 Mar;9(2):143-150. doi: 10.1177/1948550617731501. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
The 2016 European Union (EU) refugee crisis exposed a fundamental distinction in political attitudes between the political left and right. Previous findings suggest, however, that besides political orientation, ideological strength (i.e., political extremism) is also relevant to understand such distinctive attitudes. Our study reveals that the political right is more anxious, and the political left experiences more self-efficacy, about the refugee crisis. At the same time, the political extremes-at both sides of the spectrum-are more likely than moderates to believe that the solution to this societal problem is simple. Furthermore, both extremes experience more judgmental certainty about their domain-specific knowledge of the refugee crisis, independent of their actual knowledge. Finally, belief in simple solutions mediated the relationship between ideology and judgmental certainty, but only among political extremists. We conclude that both ideological orientation and strength matter to understand citizens' reactions to the refugee crisis.
2016年欧盟难民危机暴露了政治左派和右派在政治态度上的根本差异。然而,先前的研究结果表明,除了政治倾向之外,意识形态强度(即政治极端主义)对于理解这种独特态度也很重要。我们的研究表明,在难民危机问题上,政治右派更为焦虑,而政治左派则更有自我效能感。同时,政治光谱两端的极端派比温和派更倾向于认为解决这一社会问题的方法很简单。此外,无论实际知识水平如何,两个极端派对于自身在难民危机特定领域知识的判断都更为确定。最后,相信简单解决方案在意识形态与判断确定性之间起到了中介作用,但仅存在于政治极端派之中。我们得出结论,意识形态倾向和强度对于理解公民对难民危机的反应都很重要。