Medical Technology & Practice Patterns Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Department of Nephrology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Jul;72(1):10-18. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.01.034. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
An arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the recommended vascular access for hemodialysis (HD). Previous studies have not examined the resources and costs associated with creating and maintaining AVFs.
Retrospective observational study.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Elderly US Medicare patients initiating hemodialysis therapy during 2010 to 2011.
AVF primary and secondary patency and nonuse in the first year following AVF creation.
Annualized vascular access costs per patient per year.
Among patients with only a catheter at HD therapy initiation, only 54% of AVFs were successfully used for HD, 10% were used but experienced secondary patency loss within 1 year of creation, and 83% experienced primary patency loss within 1 year of creation. Mean vascular access costs per patient per year in the 2.5 years after AVF creation were $7,871 for AVFs that maintained primary patency in year 1, $13,282 for AVFs that experienced primary patency loss in year 1, $17,808 for AVFs that experienced secondary patency loss in year 1, and $31,630 for AVFs that were not used. Similar patterns were seen among patients with a mature AVF at HD therapy initiation and patients with a catheter and maturing AVF at HD therapy initiation. Overall, in 2013, fee-for-service Medicare paid $2.8 billion for dialysis vascular access-related services, ∼12% of all end-stage renal disease payments.
Lack of granularity with certain billing codes.
AVF failure in the first year after creation is common and results in substantially higher health care costs. Compared with patients whose AVFs maintained primary patency, vascular access costs were 2 to 3 times higher for patients whose AVFs experienced primary or secondary patency loss and 4 times higher for patients who never used their AVFs. There is a need to improve AVF outcomes and reduce costs after AVF creation.
动静脉瘘(AVF)是血液透析(HD)推荐的血管通路。之前的研究并未评估建立和维持 AVF 相关的资源和成本。
回顾性观察性研究。
2010 年至 2011 年期间开始血液透析治疗的美国老年 Medicare 患者。
AVF 在建立后 1 年内的一级和二级通畅率及非使用情况。
每位患者每年的血管通路年度成本。
在 HD 治疗起始时仅使用导管的患者中,仅有 54%的 AVF 成功用于 HD,10%的 AVF 在建立后 1 年内出现二级通畅丧失,83%的 AVF 在建立后 1 年内出现一级通畅丧失。在 AVF 建立后 2.5 年内,一级通畅维持的 AVF 每位患者每年的血管通路成本为 7871 美元,一级通畅丧失的 AVF 为 13282 美元,一级通畅丧失且二级通畅丧失的 AVF 为 17808 美元,未使用的 AVF 为 31630 美元。在 HD 治疗起始时已有成熟 AVF 的患者和同时存在导管和成熟 AVF 的患者中也观察到类似的模式。总体而言,2013 年,按服务收费的 Medicare 为与透析血管通路相关的服务支付了 28 亿美元,占所有终末期肾病支出的 12%左右。
某些计费代码缺乏粒度。
AVF 在建立后 1 年内发生失败较为常见,导致医疗保健成本显著增加。与一级通畅维持的患者相比,一级或二级通畅丧失的患者的血管通路成本要高出 2 至 3 倍,而从未使用过 AVF 的患者的血管通路成本要高出 4 倍。需要改善 AVF 结果并降低 AVF 建立后的成本。