Suppr超能文献

全球疫苗犹豫情况:对世卫组织/儿基会联合报告表数据(2015-2017 年)的分析。

Vaccine hesitancy around the globe: Analysis of three years of WHO/UNICEF Joint Reporting Form data-2015-2017.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2018 Jun 18;36(26):3861-3867. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.03.063. Epub 2018 Mar 28.

Abstract

In order to gather a global picture of vaccine hesitancy and whether/how it is changing, an analysis was undertaken to review three years of data available as of June 2017 from the WHO/UNICEF Joint Report Form (JRF) to determine the reported rate of vaccine hesitancy across the globe, the cited reasons for hesitancy, if these varied by country income level and/or by WHO region and whether these reasons were based upon an assessment. The reported reasons were classified using the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on Immunization matrix of hesitancy determinants (www.who.int/immunization/sage/meetings/2014/october/SAGE_working_group_revised_report_vaccine_hesitancy.pdf). Hesitancy was common, reported by >90% of countries. The list of cited reasons was long and covered 22 of 23 WHO determinants matrix categories. Even the most frequently cited category, risk- benefit (scientific evidence e.g. vaccine safety concerns), accounted for less than one quarter of all reasons cited. The reasons varied by country income level, by WHO region and over time and within a country. Thus based upon this JRF data, across the globe countries appear to understand the SAGE vaccine hesitancy definition and use it to report reasons for hesitancy. However, the rigour of the cited reasons could be improved as only just over 1/3 of countries reported that their reasons were assessment based, the rest were opinion based. With respect to any assessment in the previous five years, upper middle income countries were the least likely to have done an assessment. These analyses provided some of the evidence for the 2017 Assessment Report of the Global Vaccine Action Plan recommendation that each country develop a strategy to increase acceptance and demand for vaccination, which should include ongoing community engagement and trust-building, active hesitancy prevention, regular national assessment of vaccine concerns, and crisis response planning (www.who.int/immunization/sage/meetings/2017/october/1_GVAP_Assessment_report_web_version.pdf).

摘要

为了全面了解疫苗犹豫情况及其变化趋势,我们对截至 2017 年 6 月的三年间世卫组织/儿基会联合报告表(JRF)中的可用数据进行了分析,以确定全球疫苗犹豫率、被引用的犹豫原因(按国家收入水平和/或世卫组织区域划分),以及这些原因是否基于评估。使用免疫战略咨询专家组(SAGE)疫苗犹豫决定因素矩阵(www.who.int/immunization/sage/meetings/2014/october/SAGE_working_group_revised_report_vaccine_hesitancy.pdf)对报告的原因进行了分类。超过 90%的国家报告疫苗犹豫情况较为普遍。被引用的原因很多,涵盖了世卫组织 23 个决定因素矩阵类别的 22 个。即使是最常被引用的类别,即风险-效益(例如疫苗安全性方面的科学证据),也不到所有被引用原因的四分之一。这些原因因国家收入水平、世卫组织区域和时间以及国家内部而有所不同。因此,根据这份 JRF 数据,全球各国似乎理解 SAGE 疫苗犹豫定义,并使用它来报告犹豫的原因。然而,所引用的原因的严谨性可以提高,因为只有超过三分之一的国家报告其原因是基于评估,其余的则是基于意见。在过去五年的任何评估中,中高收入国家最不可能进行评估。这些分析为 2017 年全球疫苗行动计划评估报告中的建议提供了部分证据,即每个国家都应制定一项战略来提高对疫苗的接受程度和需求,其中应包括持续的社区参与和建立信任、积极预防犹豫、定期对疫苗问题进行国家评估,以及制定危机应对计划(www.who.int/immunization/sage/meetings/2017/october/1_GVAP_Assessment_report_web_version.pdf)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0954/5999354/8766c96417dd/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验