Suppr超能文献

英国国家医疗服务体系健康检查:一项关于接受率和结果公平性的横断面观察研究。

NHS health checks: a cross- sectional observational study on equity of uptake and outcomes.

作者信息

Coghill N, Garside L, Montgomery A A, Feder G, Horwood J

机构信息

Department for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.

Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 3;18(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3027-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Health Checks programme aims to reduce the incidence of cardiovascular diseases and health inequalities in England. We assessed equity of uptake and outcomes from NHS Health Checks in general practices in Bristol, UK.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study using patient-level data, from 38 general practices. We descriptively analysed the socioeconomic status (SES) of patients invited and the SES and ethnicity of those attending. Logistic regression was used to test associations between invitation and attendance, with population characteristics.

RESULTS

Between June 2010 to October 2014, 31,881 patients were invited, and 13,733 NHS Health Checks completed. 47% of patients invited from the three least and 39% from the two most-deprived index of multiple deprivation quintiles, completed a Check. Proportions of invited patients, by ethnicity were 64% non-black and Asian and 31% black and Asian. Men were less likely to attend than women (OR 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.80), as were patients ≤ 49 compared to ≥ 70 years (OR 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 0.83). After controlling for SES and population characteristics, compared to patients with low CVD risk, high risk patients were more likely to be prescribed cardiovascular drugs (OR 6.2, 95% confidence interval 4.51 to 8.40). Compared to men, women (OR 01.18, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.35) were more likely to be prescribed cardiovascular drugs, as were those ≤ 49 years (50-59 years, OR 1.42, 95% confidence intervals 1.13-1.79, 60-69 years, OR 1.60, 95% confidence intervals, 1.22-2.10, ≥ 70 years, OR 1.64, 95% confidence intervals, 1.14 to 2.35). Controlling for population characteristics, the following groups were most likely to be referred to lifestyle services: younger women (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.69 to 2.94), those in the most deprived IMD quintile (OR 3.22, 95% CI 1.63 to 6.36) and those at highest risk of CVD (OR, 2.77, 95% CI 1.91 to 4.02).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no statistically significant evidence of inequity in attendance for an NHS Health Check by SES. Being older or a woman were associated with better attendance. Targeting men, younger patients and ethnic minority groups may improve equity in uptake for NHS Health Checks.

摘要

背景

国家健康检查计划旨在降低英格兰心血管疾病的发病率和健康不平等现象。我们评估了英国布里斯托尔全科医疗中NHS健康检查的接受情况和结果的公平性。

方法

一项横断面研究,使用来自38家全科医疗的患者层面数据。我们对受邀患者的社会经济地位(SES)以及就诊患者的SES和种族进行了描述性分析。使用逻辑回归来检验邀请与就诊之间的关联以及与人口特征的关系。

结果

在2010年6月至2014年10月期间,共邀请了31,881名患者,完成了13,733次NHS健康检查。来自多重剥夺指数最低的三个五分位数组的受邀患者中有47%完成了检查,来自最贫困的两个五分位数组的受邀患者中有39%完成了检查。按种族划分,受邀患者的比例为非黑人和亚洲人占64%,黑人和亚洲人占31%。男性就诊的可能性低于女性(比值比0.73,95%置信区间0.67至0.80),49岁及以下的患者与70岁及以上的患者相比也是如此(比值比0.40,95%置信区间0.65至0.83)。在控制了SES和人口特征后,与心血管疾病低风险患者相比,高风险患者更有可能被开具心血管药物(比值比6.2,95%置信区间4.51至8.40)。与男性相比,女性(比值比1.18,95%置信区间1.03至1.35)更有可能被开具心血管药物,49岁及以下的患者也是如此(50 - 59岁,比值比1.42,95%置信区间1.13 - 1.79;60 - 69岁,比值比1.60,95%置信区间1.22 - 2.10;70岁及以上,比值比1.64,95%置信区间1.14至2.35)。在控制了人口特征后,以下人群最有可能被转介至生活方式服务:年轻女性(比值比2.22,95%置信区间1.69至2.94)、处于最贫困IMD五分位数组中的人群(比值比3.22,95%置信区间1.63至6.36)以及心血管疾病风险最高的人群(比值比2.77,95%置信区间1.91至4.02)。

结论

我们没有发现按SES划分的NHS健康检查就诊情况存在统计学上显著不公平的证据。年龄较大或为女性与更好的就诊情况相关。针对男性、年轻患者和少数族裔群体可能会提高NHS健康检查接受情况的公平性。

相似文献

1
NHS health checks: a cross- sectional observational study on equity of uptake and outcomes.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 3;18(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3027-8.
2
The NHS Health Check programme: implementation in east London 2009-2011.
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 13;5(4):e007578. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007578.
4
NHS Health Checks for people with mental ill-health 2013-2017: an observational study.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020 Nov 26;29:e188. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020001006.
7
Uptake of the NHS Health Checks programme in a deprived, culturally diverse setting: cross-sectional study.
J Public Health (Oxf). 2011 Sep;33(3):422-9. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr034. Epub 2011 May 5.
10
The NHS Health Check in England: an evaluation of the first 4 years.
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 13;6(1):e008840. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008840.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of GP visits in the compliance of preventive services: a cross-sectional study in Europe.
BMC Prim Care. 2024 May 15;25(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02400-w.
4
NHS Health Check programme: a rapid review update.
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 16;12(2):e052832. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052832.
5
NHS Health Checks: an observational study of equity and outcomes 2009-2017.
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Aug 26;71(710):e701-e710. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.1021. Print 2021 Sep.
7
Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the community using data from OxRen: a UK population-based cohort study.
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Mar 26;70(693):e285-e293. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X708245. Print 2020 Apr.
9
10
Cross-sectional study of patient-reported fatigue, physical activity and cardiovascular status in men after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Dec;27(12):4763-4770. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04794-1. Epub 2019 Apr 10.

本文引用的文献

1
NHS Health Check comorbidity and management: an observational matched study in primary care.
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Feb;67(655):e86-e93. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X688837. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
2
Cost effectiveness of case-finding strategies for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a modelling study.
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Jan;67(654):e67-e77. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X687973. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
4
Targeted case finding in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial.
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Oct;66(651):e758-67. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X686629. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
10
The NHS Health Check in England: an evaluation of the first 4 years.
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 13;6(1):e008840. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008840.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验