Suppr超能文献

右美托咪定还是芬太尼?实验猪丙泊酚-氯胺酮全静脉麻醉期间的心血管稳定性和镇痛作用。

Dexmedetomidine or fentanyl? Cardiovascular stability and analgesia during propofol-ketamine total intravenous anaesthesia in experimental pigs.

作者信息

Lervik Andreas, Raszplewicz Joanna, Ranheim Birgit, Solbak Susanna, Toverud Simen F, Haga Henning A

机构信息

Department of Companion Animal Clinical Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Oslo, Norway.

Small Animal Teaching Hospital, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Vet Anaesth Analg. 2018 May;45(3):295-308. doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2017.08.012. Epub 2017 Dec 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare cardiovascular function and response to nociception during total intravenous anaesthesia in pigs with propofol, ketamine and either dexmedetomidine or fentanyl administered as a continuous infusion.

STUDY DESIGN

Blinded, randomized, balanced, crossover study ANIMALS: Eight immunocastrated male, mixed breed pigs with a mean ± standard deviation body weight of 26.4 ± 1.9 kg for dexmedetomidine and 27.5 ± 3.8 kg for fentanyl treatment.

METHODS

The animals were anaesthetized twice with either propofol-ketamine-dexmedetomidine (DEX) or fentanyl (FENT). DEX was infused at 2, 4 and 8 μg kg hour and FENT at 25, 50 and 100 μg kg hour. Each infusion rate was administered for 80 minutes prior to commencing the next. Heart rate (HR), 3-lead electrocardiogram, systolic, mean and diastolic arterial blood pressure (SAP, MAP, DAP) in addition to cardiac output measured by transpulmonary thermodilution was used to monitor cardiovascular function. Mechanical and electrical stimulation (nociceptive withdrawal reflex, NWR) was used to elicit nociceptive responses. Similar anaesthetic depth was determined based on the NWR response. Cardiovascular parameters were compared statistically at this time. Additionally, response to nociceptive stimulation and cardiovascular response over time were compared.

RESULTS

DEX-treated pigs had significantly higher HR, SAP, DAP, MAP, systemic vascular resistance, haemoglobin concentration, content of oxygen in arterial and venous blood and oxygen delivery index than FENT-treated pigs at similar anaesthetic depth, whereas stroke volume index was significantly higher in FENT. Motoric response to mechanical nociceptive stimulation was abolished prior to any decrease in NWR response in FENT, whereas the two responses decreased more in unison in DEX. The cardiovascular response to nociception was less pronounced in DEX than in FENT.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Propofol combined with ketamine and either fentanyl or dexmedetomidine provides stable cardiovascular conditions in normovolaemic, healthy pigs. Based on cardiovascular response and depression of NWR, dexmedetomidine apparently provides superior analgesia to fentanyl.

摘要

目的

比较在猪全凭静脉麻醉期间,持续输注丙泊酚、氯胺酮并分别联合右美托咪定或芬太尼时的心血管功能及对伤害性刺激的反应。

研究设计

双盲、随机、均衡、交叉研究

动物

8只免疫去势的雄性杂种猪,右美托咪定组平均体重为26.4±1.9千克,芬太尼组平均体重为27.5±3.8千克。

方法

动物分别接受丙泊酚-氯胺酮-右美托咪定(DEX)或丙泊酚-氯胺酮-芬太尼(FENT)麻醉2次。DEX以2、4和8μg·kg·小时的速率输注,FENT以25、50和100μg·kg·小时的速率输注。每个输注速率在下一个速率开始前持续输注80分钟。采用心率(HR)、3导联心电图、收缩压、平均动脉压和舒张压(SAP、MAP、DAP)以及经肺热稀释法测量的心输出量来监测心血管功能。采用机械和电刺激(伤害性退缩反射,NWR)引发伤害性反应。根据NWR反应确定相似的麻醉深度。此时对心血管参数进行统计学比较。此外,比较伤害性刺激反应和随时间的心血管反应。

结果

在相似麻醉深度下,DEX组猪的HR、SAP、DAP、MAP、全身血管阻力、血红蛋白浓度、动脉血和静脉血中的氧含量以及氧输送指数显著高于FENT组猪,而FENT组的每搏量指数显著更高。在FENT组,对机械性伤害性刺激的运动反应在NWR反应降低之前就已消失,而在DEX组,这两种反应下降更为同步。DEX组对伤害性刺激的心血管反应不如FENT组明显。

结论及临床意义

丙泊酚联合氯胺酮及芬太尼或右美托咪定可使血容量正常的健康猪维持稳定的心血管状态。基于心血管反应和NWR抑制情况,右美托咪定的镇痛效果明显优于芬太尼。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验