Bilal Muhammad, Haseeb Abdul, Arshad Mohammad H, Jaliawala Altamash A, Farooqui Iman, Minhas Amna, Hussaini Ahmedullah, Khan Arsalan A, Ahmad Sharjeel, Saleem Zainab, Awan Ozair, Sabahat Noor Us, Ayaz Araib, Rizwan Haania
Department of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), Karachi, Pakistan.
Internal Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital.
Cureus. 2018 Jan 23;10(1):e2101. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2101.
Background In developing countries like Pakistan, treatment is mediated by private and public healthcare setups with a limited budget for health facilities. Moreover, the inappropriate use of treadmill tests imposes a burden on healthcare resources and leads to unwarranted interventions. Our aim is to assess the prevalence and predictors of inappropriate referrals for the exercise tolerance test (ETT) to diagnose coronary artery disease (CAD) while taking public and private healthcare settings into consideration. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted to find the prevalence of the inappropriate use of ETT to diagnose obstructive CAD and to determine the factors responsible for it. A total of 264 patients were enrolled from outpatient departments in Karachi. The inclusion criterion was the referral of treadmill testing for the diagnosis of CAT. The analysis was performed by logistic regression models to ascertain independent predictors of inappropriate use. Results Exercise stress tests were found to be inappropriate in 209 (79%) patients. The study indicated that the majority of patients had a low or very low pre-test probability of CAD. Diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were less frequent in the inappropriate as compared to the appropriate referrals (10%, 45%, and 16% versus 20%, 69%, and 32%). Both public and private sectors showed a high prevalence of inappropriate testing, but it was much higher in the latter (27% versus 73%, P < 0.001). In all regression models, the private healthcare system was the major independent predictor for inappropriate indications of ETT with an average odds ratio of 4.9 (P < 0.001). Conclusion The high prevalence of ETT referrals was found for the diagnosis of CAD. This result was consistent with both public and private healthcare systems, but it was considerably higher in private setups. Comorbidities, number of risk factors, and cardiovascular risk were not associated with the inappropriate use of ETT.
背景 在巴基斯坦等发展中国家,治疗由公共和私立医疗保健机构提供,而用于卫生设施的预算有限。此外,跑步机测试的不当使用给医疗资源带来负担,并导致不必要的干预措施。我们的目的是在考虑公共和私立医疗保健环境的同时,评估运动耐量测试(ETT)诊断冠状动脉疾病(CAD)时不适当转诊的患病率及预测因素。
方法 开展一项横断面研究,以确定ETT用于诊断阻塞性CAD的不当使用情况,并确定其相关因素。从卡拉奇的门诊部共纳入264例患者。纳入标准是转诊进行跑步机测试以诊断CAD。通过逻辑回归模型进行分析,以确定不当使用的独立预测因素。
结果 发现209例(79%)患者的运动应激测试不适当。该研究表明,大多数患者CAD的测试前概率较低或非常低。与适当转诊的患者相比,糖尿病、高血压和血脂异常在不适当转诊患者中出现的频率较低(分别为10%、45%和16%,而适当转诊患者中分别为20%、69%和32%)。公共和私立部门均显示不适当测试的患病率较高,但私立部门更高(分别为27%和73%,P<0.001)。在所有回归模型中,私立医疗保健系统是ETT不适当指征的主要独立预测因素,平均比值比为4.9(P<0.001)。
结论 发现用于诊断CAD的ETT转诊患病率较高。这一结果在公共和私立医疗保健系统中均一致,但在私立机构中更高。合并症、危险因素数量和心血管风险与ETT的不当使用无关。