Translational Laboratory and Biorepository, Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA United States of America.
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA United States of America.
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 20;13(4):e0195318. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195318. eCollection 2018.
Past and recent attempts at devising objective biomarkers for traumatic brain injury (TBI) in both blood and cerebrospinal fluid have focused on abundance measures of time-dependent proteins. Similar independent determinants would be most welcome in diagnosing the most common form of TBI, mild TBI (mTBI), which remains difficult to define and confirm based solely on clinical criteria. There are currently no consensus diagnostic measures that objectively define individuals as having sustained an acute mTBI. Plasma metabolomic analyses have recently evolved to offer an alternative to proteomic analyses, offering an orthogonal diagnostic measure to what is currently available. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a developed set of metabolomic biomarkers is able to objectively classify college athletes sustaining mTBI from non-injured teammates, within 6 hours of trauma and whether such a biomarker panel could be effectively applied to an independent cohort of TBI and control subjects. A 6-metabolite panel was developed from biomarkers that had their identities confirmed using tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) in our Athlete cohort. These biomarkers were defined at ≤6 hours following mTBI and objectively classified mTBI athletes from teammate controls, and provided similar classification of these groups at the 2, 3, and 7 days post-mTBI. The same 6-metabolite panel, when applied to a separate, independent cohort provided statistically similar results despite major differences between the two cohorts. Our confirmed plasma biomarker panel objectively classifies acute mTBI cases from controls within 6 hours of injury in our two independent cohorts. While encouraged by our initial results, we expect future studies to expand on these initial observations.
过去和近期在血液和脑脊液中为创伤性脑损伤(TBI)设计客观生物标志物的尝试都集中在依赖时间的蛋白质丰度测量上。在诊断最常见的创伤性脑损伤形式,即轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)方面,类似的独立决定因素将非常受欢迎,仅基于临床标准,mTBI 仍然难以定义和确认。目前,没有客观定义个体遭受急性 mTBI 的共识诊断措施。血浆代谢组学分析最近已经发展为蛋白质组学分析的替代方法,为目前可用的方法提供了正交诊断措施。本研究的目的是确定一组已开发的代谢组学生物标志物是否能够客观地将遭受 mTBI 的大学生运动员与未受伤的队友区分开来,时间在创伤后 6 小时内,以及这种生物标志物是否可以有效地应用于独立的 TBI 和对照组队列。在我们的运动员队列中,使用串联质谱(MS/MS)确认了生物标志物的身份后,开发了一个 6 代谢物标志物面板。这些生物标志物在 mTBI 后≤6 小时内被定义,客观地将 mTBI 运动员与队友对照组区分开来,并在 mTBI 后 2、3 和 7 天提供了这些组的类似分类。尽管两个队列之间存在重大差异,但相同的 6 代谢物面板应用于独立的队列时,提供了统计学上相似的结果。我们经过验证的血浆生物标志物在我们的两个独立队列中,在受伤后 6 小时内客观地将急性 mTBI 病例与对照组区分开来。虽然我们的初步结果令人鼓舞,但我们期望未来的研究能够扩展这些初步观察结果。