Martín-Valls Gerard E, Hidalgo Mireia, Cano Esmeralda, Mateu Enric
Department Sanitat i Anatomia Animals, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain; Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA-IRTA-UAB), Edifici CRESA, Campus UAB, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA-IRTA-UAB), Edifici CRESA, Campus UAB, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
Vet J. 2018 Apr;234:27-29. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
The objective of this study was to test the suitability of umbilical cord (UC) sampling and ear vein swabbing (EVS) as alternatives to jugular vein bleeding (JVB) for the assessment of vertical transmission of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV). Twelve farms suspected to be PRRSV-positive unstable were selected and the three types of samples were obtained from 21 batches of newborn piglets (n=387). The proportions of positive results, viral loads and time spent to collect the samples were compared. UC yielded the highest detection rate, with 76 positives compared to 55 JVB- and 45 EV-positive results (P<0.05). Average Ct values were 26.6±8.5 for JVB, 30.8±6.4 for EV and 32.1±4.85 for UC (P<0.01). UC was the fastest collection method (mean 24s vs. 55s for EV and 72s for JVB; P<0.05). In this study, UC testing was a faster and more sensitive alternative to JVB or EV for the detection of PRRSV in newborn piglets.
本研究的目的是测试脐带血采样(UC)和耳静脉拭子采样(EVS)作为颈静脉采血(JVB)的替代方法,用于评估猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒(PRRSV)垂直传播的适用性。选择了12个疑似PRRSV阳性不稳定的猪场,并从21批新生仔猪(n = 387)中获取了三种类型的样本。比较了阳性结果的比例、病毒载量和采集样本所花费的时间。UC的检测率最高,有76个阳性结果,而JVB为55个阳性结果,EVS为45个阳性结果(P<0.05)。JVB的平均Ct值为26.6±8.5,EVS为30.8±6.4,UC为32.1±4.85(P<0.01)。UC是最快的采集方法(平均24秒,而EVS为55秒,JVB为72秒;P<0.05)。在本研究中,对于检测新生仔猪中的PRRSV,UC检测是一种比JVB或EVS更快、更灵敏的替代方法。