Suppr超能文献

人为性皮炎的组织病理学模式。

Histopathological patterns in dermatitis artefacta.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.

出版信息

J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2018 May;16(5):559-564. doi: 10.1111/ddg.13504. Epub 2018 Apr 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dermatitis artefacta is a relevant and frequently unrecognized clinical condition associated with self-harming behavior, in which unconscious manipulation causes skin lesions. While atypical lesions and an unusual disease course may give rise to clinical suspicion of a self-induced disorder, questioning and examining these patients usually fails to confirm or clarify this suspicion. In this setting, the dermatopathologist may be faced with the question whether there are any histological signs corroborating the diagnosis of dermatitis artefacta.

METHODS

We conducted a Pubmed search (without time frame) using the terms "dermatitis artefacta", "factitious/factitial dermatitis", "artefactual skin" in combination with "histology" or "pathology". Given the low number of hits, we extended the search by adding terms related to certain types of injuries (for example, "burn" or "cold") in order to identify specific patterns.

RESULTS

In general, there are only few studies investigating the histological features of factitious skin disorders. Another problem arises from the fact that, even if clinical and histological findings are suggestive of dermatitis artefacta, subsequent confirmation of the exact mechanism of injury is frequently not possible, thus leaving room for speculation. This complicates defining specific histological patterns based on the various types of injuries. Overall, the results of the present study suggest that a factitious disorder should be considered if histological findings include blistering with a mild inflammatory infiltrate, rupture of collagen fibers, multinucleated keratinocytes, or elongated and vertically aligned keratinocytic nuclei.

摘要

背景

人为性皮炎是一种相关的、经常被忽视的临床病症,与自伤行为有关,在这种病症中,无意识的操作会导致皮肤损伤。虽然不典型的病变和不寻常的病程可能会引起对自我诱发疾病的临床怀疑,但对这些患者的询问和检查通常无法证实或澄清这种怀疑。在这种情况下,皮肤科病理学家可能会面临这样一个问题,即是否有任何组织学迹象支持人为性皮炎的诊断。

方法

我们使用了术语“人为性皮炎”、“人为/人工性皮炎”、“人为性皮肤”与“组织学”或“病理学”结合起来,在 Pubmed 上进行了无时间限制的搜索。由于命中次数较少,我们通过添加与某些类型的损伤(例如,“烧伤”或“冷伤”)相关的术语来扩展搜索,以确定特定的模式。

结果

一般来说,只有少数研究调查了人为性皮肤疾病的组织学特征。另一个问题是,即使临床和组织学发现提示为人为性皮炎,随后对确切的损伤机制的确认通常也不可能,因此存在推测的空间。这使得基于各种损伤类型来定义特定的组织学模式变得复杂。总的来说,本研究的结果表明,如果组织学发现包括水疱伴轻度炎症浸润、胶原纤维破裂、多核角质形成细胞或伸长和垂直排列的角质形成细胞核,应考虑人为性疾病。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验