School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia.
School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Dec;99(12):2570-2582. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.03.015. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
The aim of this systematic review was to identify the effect of specific exercise parameters on physical function and quality of life (QOL) in people with chronic heart failure living in the community.
A total of 5 electronic databases were searched for relevant studies published after 1994.
The screening process was completed by 2 independent researchers, with a third independent reviewer for conflict resolution. Studies were selected if they included only chronic hHart failure participants, and the sole intervention was a structured exercise training program in an outpatient or community setting.
Two independent researchers completed the data extraction and qualiy assessment. Quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation scales.
In total, 40 articles (n=5411) were included in the review for meta-analysis and meta-regression, including 27 randomized control trials and 13 cohort studies. Exercise was shown to have a positive effect on QOL outcomes (standardized mean difference 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-1.56) with the most commonly used measure, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, showing a clinically significant change of 8.5 points. Physical function was improved postexercise intervention in the 23 included studies (standardized mean difference 0.89; 95% CI, 0.40-1.38), with a clinically significant change of 49.8 m seen in studies using the 6-minute walk test (95% CI, 26.52-73.13). These improvements were independent of study design, study quality, participant demographics, disease severity, and exercise prescription variables.
Exercise significantly improves QOL and physical function. Current evidence suggests that engagement with exercise is a more important factor in achieving improvement than how the exercise is performed. Future research should aim to identify and address barriers to engagement in exercise rehabilitation in this population.
本系统评价旨在确定特定运动参数对社区中慢性心力衰竭患者身体功能和生活质量(QOL)的影响。
共检索了 5 个电子数据库,以获取 1994 年后发表的相关研究。
两名独立研究人员完成了筛选过程,如果研究仅包括慢性心力衰竭参与者,且唯一干预措施是在门诊或社区环境中进行结构化运动训练计划,则选择研究。
两名独立研究人员完成了数据提取和质量评估。使用物理治疗证据数据库和推荐评估、制定和评估分级量表评估质量。
共有 40 篇文章(n=5411)纳入综述进行荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析,包括 27 项随机对照试验和 13 项队列研究。运动对 QOL 结果有积极影响(标准化均数差 1.16;95%置信区间[CI],0.76-1.56),最常用的测量方法,明尼苏达州心力衰竭生活质量问卷,显示出 8.5 分的临床显著变化。在 23 项纳入研究中,运动干预后身体功能得到改善(标准化均数差 0.89;95% CI,0.40-1.38),6 分钟步行试验(95% CI,26.52-73.13)研究中观察到 49.8m 的临床显著变化。这些改善与研究设计、研究质量、参与者人口统计学、疾病严重程度和运动处方变量无关。
运动显著改善 QOL 和身体功能。目前的证据表明,参与运动是实现改善的更重要因素,而不是运动的执行方式。未来的研究应旨在确定并解决该人群中参与运动康复的障碍。