Suppr超能文献

多步骤估计量的研究间方差:与 Paule-Mandel 估计量的关系。

Multistep estimators of the between-study variance: The relationship with the Paule-Mandel estimator.

机构信息

Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Statistical Innovation Group, Advanced Analytics Centre, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2018 Jul 30;37(17):2616-2629. doi: 10.1002/sim.7665. Epub 2018 Apr 26.

Abstract

A wide variety of estimators of the between-study variance are available in random-effects meta-analysis. Many, but not all, of these estimators are based on the method of moments. The DerSimonian-Laird estimator is widely used in applications, but the Paule-Mandel estimator is an alternative that is now recommended. Recently, DerSimonian and Kacker have developed two-step moment-based estimators of the between-study variance. We extend these two-step estimators so that multiple (more than two) steps are used. We establish the surprising result that the multistep estimator tends towards the Paule-Mandel estimator as the number of steps becomes large. Hence, the iterative scheme underlying our new multistep estimator provides a hitherto unknown relationship between two-step estimators and Paule-Mandel estimator. Our analysis suggests that two-step estimators are not necessarily distinct estimators in their own right; instead, they are quantities that are closely related to the usual iterative scheme that is used to calculate the Paule-Mandel estimate. The relationship that we establish between the multistep and Paule-Mandel estimator is another justification for the use of the latter estimator. Two-step and multistep estimators are perhaps best conceptualized as approximate Paule-Mandel estimators.

摘要

在随机效应荟萃分析中,有各种各样的研究间方差估计量。这些估计量中有许多(但不是全部)是基于矩方法的。DerSimonian-Laird 估计量在应用中被广泛使用,但 Paule-Mandel 估计量是另一种替代方法,现在也被推荐使用。最近,DerSimonian 和 Kacker 开发了两种基于矩的两步研究间方差估计量。我们将这两种两步估计量扩展为使用多个(两个以上)步骤。我们得出了一个令人惊讶的结果,即随着步骤数的增加,多步估计量趋于 Paule-Mandel 估计量。因此,我们新的多步估计量所基于的迭代方案提供了两步估计量和 Paule-Mandel 估计量之间迄今为止未知的关系。我们的分析表明,两步估计量本身不一定是独特的估计量;相反,它们是与通常用于计算 Paule-Mandel 估计量的迭代方案密切相关的量。我们在多步和 Paule-Mandel 估计量之间建立的关系是后者估计量的另一个理由。两步和多步估计量最好被视为近似的 Paule-Mandel 估计量。

相似文献

1
Multistep estimators of the between-study variance: The relationship with the Paule-Mandel estimator.
Stat Med. 2018 Jul 30;37(17):2616-2629. doi: 10.1002/sim.7665. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
3
Paule-Mandel estimators for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Dec;8(4):416-434. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1244. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
4
A note on the empirical Bayes heterogeneity variance estimator in meta-analysis.
Stat Med. 2019 Sep 10;38(20):3804-3816. doi: 10.1002/sim.8197. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
6
Estimation of between-trial variance in sequential meta-analyses: a simulation study.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Jan;37(1):129-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
7
Methods for estimating between-study variance and overall effect in meta-analysis of odds ratios.
Res Synth Methods. 2020 May;11(3):426-442. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1404. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
8
On the Q statistic with constant weights for standardized mean difference.
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2022 Nov;75(3):444-465. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12263. Epub 2022 Jan 30.
9
A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses.
Res Synth Methods. 2019 Mar;10(1):83-98. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1316. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
10
Comparative performance of heterogeneity variance estimators in meta-analysis: a review of simulation studies.
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Jun;8(2):181-198. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1198. Epub 2016 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
A new estimator of between study variance of standardized mean difference in meta-analysis.
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 1;19(11):e0308628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308628. eCollection 2024.
4
Ranibizumab for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Front Pediatr. 2023 Aug 4;11:1202927. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1202927. eCollection 2023.
9
Meta-Analysis for Epigenome-Wide Association Studies.
Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2432:101-111. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1994-0_8.
10
A likelihood ratio test for the homogeneity of between-study variance in network meta-analysis.
Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 9;10(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01859-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Consensus Values and Weighting Factors.
J Res Natl Bur Stand (1977). 1982 Sep-Oct;87(5):377-385. doi: 10.6028/jres.087.022.
2
Paule-Mandel estimators for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Dec;8(4):416-434. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1244. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
4
Comparative performance of heterogeneity variance estimators in meta-analysis: a review of simulation studies.
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Jun;8(2):181-198. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1198. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
5
Hartung-Knapp method is not always conservative compared with fixed-effect meta-analysis.
Stat Med. 2016 Jul 10;35(15):2503-15. doi: 10.1002/sim.6879. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
6
Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis.
Res Synth Methods. 2016 Mar;7(1):55-79. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1164. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
7
Misunderstandings about Q and 'Cochran's Q test' in meta-analysis.
Stat Med. 2016 Feb 20;35(4):485-95. doi: 10.1002/sim.6632. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
9
An accurate test for homogeneity of odds ratios based on Cochran's Q-statistic.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Jun 10;15:49. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0034-x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验