Kawashima Hirohiko, Nagai Norihiro, Shinoda Hajime, Tsubota Kazuo, Ozawa Yoko
Laboratory of Retinal Cell Biology.
Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University, School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjukuku Tokyo, Japan.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Apr;97(17):e0321. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010321.
Recent progress in medical technology has resulted in improved surgical outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV); with microincision systems, the incidence of procedure-related complications during surgery has been reduced. However, unpredictable visual field defects after PPV remain an unresolved issue. A few reports have shown that damage to the retinal neurofibers owing to dry-up during air/fluid exchange or retinal neurotoxicity of the dye used to visualize the internal limiting membrane (ILM), as well as unintentional removal of retinal neurofibers during ILM peeling, are responsible for such visual field disorders. In this report, we present a case of extensive visual field defect due to optic neuropathy exhibiting vertical hemianopsia after PPV.
A 50-year-old woman underwent PPV and cataract surgery for a macular hole and mild cataract under retrobulbar anesthesia with 3.5 mL of xylocaine. At the time of opening an infusion cannula for PPV, the intraocular lens was herniating, with an acute increase in pressure from the posterior eyeball; thus, intraocular pressure configuration level had to be decreased from the default level, whereas the other procedures including 20% SF6 injection were performed without any modification. The macular hole was closed postoperatively. However, the patient experienced nasal hemianopsia, which turned out to be optic neuropathy, as assessed via electric physiological examinations. The pattern of the visual field defect was not typical for glaucoma or anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Her optic nerve head was pale at the temporal side soon after the surgery, and her blood pressure was low, suggesting that there may have been a congestion of the optic nerve feeder vessels because of the relatively high pressure in the orbit. The space occupancy with xylocaine and extensively stretched and plumped out eye ball with infusion during PPV may have pressed the surrounding tissue of the optic nerve and the feeder vessels.
PPV is safe for most patients; however, individual variations in local and/or systemic conditions may cause complications. Future studies to optimize the surgical condition for each individual patient may be warranted.
医学技术的最新进展使玻璃体切割术(PPV)的手术效果得到改善;借助微切口系统,手术过程中与手术相关的并发症发生率有所降低。然而,PPV术后不可预测的视野缺损仍是一个未解决的问题。一些报告表明,气/液交换过程中的干燥导致视网膜神经纤维受损、用于可视化内界膜(ILM)的染料具有视网膜神经毒性,以及ILM剥离过程中意外去除视网膜神经纤维,是导致此类视野障碍的原因。在本报告中,我们介绍了一例PPV术后因视神经病变出现垂直偏盲导致广泛视野缺损的病例。
一名50岁女性在球后注射3.5 mL利多卡因麻醉下接受了PPV和白内障手术,以治疗黄斑裂孔和轻度白内障。在为PPV打开输液套管时,人工晶状体疝出,眼球后部压力急剧升高;因此,眼内压配置水平不得不从默认水平降低,而包括20%六氟化硫注射在内的其他操作未作任何修改。术后黄斑裂孔闭合。然而,患者出现鼻侧偏盲,经电生理检查评估为视神经病变。视野缺损模式并非青光眼或前部缺血性视神经病变的典型表现。术后不久,她的视神经乳头颞侧苍白,血压较低,提示可能由于眼眶内压力相对较高,导致视神经供血血管充血。PPV期间利多卡因的占位效应以及输液时眼球广泛伸展和肿胀可能压迫了视神经周围组织和供血血管。
PPV对大多数患者是安全的;然而,局部和/或全身状况的个体差异可能会导致并发症。未来可能需要开展研究,为每个患者优化手术条件。