Puntel Laila A, Sawyer John E, Barker Daniel W, Thorburn Peter J, Castellano Michael J, Moore Kenneth J, VanLoocke Andrew, Heaton Emily A, Archontoulis Sotirios V
Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
CSIRO Agriculture, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Apr 13;9:436. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00436. eCollection 2018.
Historically crop models have been used to evaluate crop yield responses to nitrogen (N) rates after harvest when it is too late for the farmers to make in-season adjustments. We hypothesize that the use of a crop model as an in-season forecast tool will improve current N decision-making. To explore this, we used the Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator (APSIM) calibrated with long-term experimental data for central Iowa, USA (16-years in continuous corn and 15-years in soybean-corn rotation) combined with actual weather data up to a specific crop stage and historical weather data thereafter. The objectives were to: (1) evaluate the accuracy and uncertainty of corn yield and economic optimum N rate (EONR) predictions at four forecast times (planting time, 6th and 12th leaf, and silking phenological stages); (2) determine whether the use of analogous historical weather years based on precipitation and temperature patterns as opposed to using a 35-year dataset could improve the accuracy of the forecast; and (3) quantify the value added by the crop model in predicting annual EONR and yields using the site-mean EONR and the yield at the EONR to benchmark predicted values. Results indicated that the mean corn yield predictions at planting time ( = 0.77) using 35-years of historical weather was close to the observed and predicted yield at maturity ( = 0.81). Across all forecasting times, the EONR predictions were more accurate in corn-corn than soybean-corn rotation (relative root mean square error, RRMSE, of 25 vs. 45%, respectively). At planting time, the APSIM model predicted the direction of optimum N rates (above, below or at average site-mean EONR) in 62% of the cases examined ( = 31) with an average error range of ±38 kg N ha (22% of the average N rate). Across all forecast times, prediction error of EONR was about three times higher than yield predictions. The use of the 35-year weather record was better than using selected historical weather years to forecast (RRMSE was on average 3% lower). Overall, the proposed approach of using the crop model as a forecasting tool could improve year-to-year predictability of corn yields and optimum N rates. Further improvements in modeling and set-up protocols are needed toward more accurate forecast, especially for extreme weather years with the most significant economic and environmental cost.
从历史上看,作物模型一直被用于在收获后评估作物产量对施氮量的响应,而此时农民已来不及在季中进行调整。我们假设将作物模型用作季中预测工具将改善当前的氮肥决策。为了探究这一点,我们使用了农业生产系统模拟器(APSIM),该模型用美国爱荷华州中部的长期实验数据(连续种植玉米16年,大豆 - 玉米轮作15年)进行了校准,并结合了特定作物阶段之前的实际天气数据以及此后的历史天气数据。目标是:(1)评估在四个预测时间(播种期、第6片和第12片叶期以及抽丝物候期)对玉米产量和经济最佳施氮量(EONR)预测的准确性和不确定性;(2)确定基于降水和温度模式使用类似的历史气象年份而非使用35年数据集是否能提高预测的准确性;(3)使用田间平均EONR和EONR下的产量作为基准预测值,量化作物模型在预测年度EONR和产量方面增加的价值。结果表明,使用35年历史天气数据在播种期预测的玉米平均产量(R² = 0.77)接近成熟时的观测产量和预测产量(R² = 0.81)。在所有预测时间内,玉米 - 玉米轮作中EONR的预测比大豆 - 玉米轮作更准确(相对均方根误差,RRMSE,分别为25%和45%)。在播种期,APSIM模型在62%(n = 31)的检测案例中预测了最佳施氮量的方向(高于、低于或等于田间平均EONR),平均误差范围为±38 kg N/ha(占平均施氮量的22%)。在所有预测时间内,EONR的预测误差比产量预测误差大约高三倍。使用35年天气记录比使用选定的历史气象年份进行预测更好(RRMSE平均低3%)。总体而言,将作物模型用作预测工具所提出的方法可以提高玉米产量和最佳施氮量的逐年可预测性。需要在建模和设置协议方面进一步改进以实现更准确的预测,特别是对于经济和环境成本最高的极端气象年份。