Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2018 May 2;13(5):e0196031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196031. eCollection 2018.
In year 2016, the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) updated Recommendations for the assessment and grading of diastolic dysfunction (DD). We aimed to assess the applicability of this DD grading method and its association with prognosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We retrospectively identified 237 consecutive patients with severe AS who underwent trans-femoral TAVI. Baseline transthoracic echocardiography was evaluated to assess pre- and post-TAVI diastolic function according to the current ASE/EACVI Recommendations. Prior to TAVI, 41 (17%) patients were diagnosed as having grade I DD, 111 (47%) patients had grade II DD, 80 (34%) had grade III DD. DD grade after TAVI decreased (p < 0.001) with 75 patients (32%) reclassified to a lower DD grade. During the median follow-up of 1,320 days, 136 (57%) patients died. In univariable Cox proportional hazards model analysis, neither pre- nor post-TAVI DD grade were associated with prognosis. However, patients with grade III DD detected before TAVI and AR≥ 2 after TAVI had poorer survival (p<0.008). Patients with grade III DD detected after TAVI and AR≥ 2 after TAVI had poorer prognosis (p = 0.002). TAVI improves DD grade. While poor DD grade was not associated with mortality after treatment of AS by TAVI, concomitant presence of DD and post-procedural AR carried a poor prognosis.
2016 年,美国超声心动图学会(ASE)和欧洲心血管影像协会(EACVI)更新了舒张功能障碍(DD)评估和分级的建议。我们旨在评估这种 DD 分级方法在经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者中的适用性及其与预后的关系。我们回顾性地确定了 237 例连续接受经股 TAVI 治疗的严重 AS 患者。根据现行的 ASE/EACVI 建议,对基线经胸超声心动图进行评估,以评估 TAVI 前后的舒张功能。在 TAVI 之前,41 例(17%)患者被诊断为 I 级 DD,111 例(47%)患者为 II 级 DD,80 例(34%)患者为 III 级 DD。TAVI 后 DD 分级降低(p<0.001),75 例(32%)患者重新分类为较低的 DD 分级。在中位数为 1320 天的随访期间,136 例(57%)患者死亡。在单变量 Cox 比例风险模型分析中,无论是 TAVI 前还是 TAVI 后 DD 分级都与预后无关。然而,TAVI 前存在 III 级 DD 和 TAVI 后 AR≥2 的患者生存率较差(p<0.008)。TAVI 后存在 III 级 DD 和 TAVI 后 AR≥2 的患者预后较差(p=0.002)。TAVI 改善 DD 分级。虽然 TAVI 治疗 AS 后 DD 分级差与死亡率无关,但 DD 与术后 AR 并存提示预后不良。