Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Hospital Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany.
Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Aug;27(8):e235-e242. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.055. Epub 2018 May 2.
Recurrent instability is a frequent complication following arthroscopic Bankart repair. The purpose of this study was to investigate risk factors for poor patient-reported clinical outcome scores and failure rates.
Patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair at least 2 years earlier were included. Preoperative and postoperative Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation; Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; and satisfaction scores were collected. The relationship of the following factors with outcomes and failure rates was assessed: (1) previous arthroscopic stabilization, (2) 3 or more dislocations prior to surgery, (3) glenoid labral articular disruption (GLAD) lesion, (4) concurrent superior labral anterior-to-posterior tear repair, and (5) concurrent biceps tenodesis.
The study included 72 patients with a median age of 23 years (range, 14-49 years). Subsequent revision was required in 9 (12.5%); 1 additional patient (1.4%) had recurrent dislocation. Outcome data were available at a median follow-up of 3 years (range, 2-9 years). All scores significantly improved from preoperatively to postoperatively (P <.05); the mean patient satisfaction score was 9, with a median of 10 (range, 1-10). None of the analyzed factors were associated with worse postoperative outcome scores. GLAD lesions were significantly associated with a higher rate of failure (P = .007). No other analyzed factors had a significant association with failure rates (P > .05).
Patients with arthroscopic Bankart repair for traumatic anteroinferior shoulder instability had excellent outcomes, even in the context of previous arthroscopic stabilization surgery, 3 or more dislocations prior to surgery, concurrent superior labral anterior-to-posterior tear repair, or concurrent biceps tenodesis. However, GLAD lesions were associated with higher rates of failure, and the presence of a GLAD lesion may herald the presence of changes in the articular version or other as-yet-undetermined factors that could predispose patients to failure.
关节镜下 Bankart 修复术后反复不稳定是一种常见的并发症。本研究旨在探讨影响患者报告的临床结局评分和失败率的危险因素。
纳入至少 2 年前接受关节镜下 Bankart 修复术的患者。收集术前和术后的单项评估数值评估;快速上肢肩部和手部残疾问卷;美国肩肘外科医师学会评分;以及满意度评分。评估以下因素与结局和失败率的关系:(1)既往关节镜稳定术,(2)术前 3 次或以上脱位,(3)关节盂唇关节面破坏(GLAD)病变,(4)同期肩袖上盂唇前-后撕裂修复,和(5)同期肱二头肌长头腱切断术。
本研究纳入了 72 例患者,中位年龄 23 岁(范围,14-49 岁)。9 例(12.5%)需要后续翻修;另外 1 例(1.4%)患者出现复发性脱位。中位随访时间为 3 年(范围,2-9 年)时获得了结局数据。所有评分均从术前到术后显著改善(P <.05);患者满意度平均评分为 9 分,中位数为 10 分(范围,1-10 分)。分析的因素均与术后结局评分无显著相关性。GLAD 病变与更高的失败率显著相关(P = .007)。其他分析因素与失败率无显著相关性(P > .05)。
对于创伤性前下盂肱关节不稳定的患者,行关节镜下 Bankart 修复术可获得良好的结局,即使是在既往关节镜稳定术、术前 3 次或以上脱位、同期肩袖上盂唇前-后撕裂修复或同期肱二头肌长头腱切断术的情况下也是如此。然而,GLAD 病变与更高的失败率相关,GLAD 病变的存在可能预示着关节面版本或其他尚未确定的因素发生变化,这些因素可能使患者容易失败。