Dekker Luuk, Houtzager Tessa, Kilume Omary, Horogo John, van Roosmalen Jos, Nyamtema Angelo Sadock
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St. Francis Referral Hospital, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 15;18(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1814-1.
Caesarean section (CS) is often a life-saving procedure, but can also lead to serious complications, even more so in low-resource settings. Therefore unnecessary CS should be avoided and optimal circumstances for vaginal delivery should be created. In this study, we aim to audit indications for Caesarean sections and improve decision-making and obstetric management.
Audit of all cases of CS performed from January to August 2013 was performed in a rural referral hospital in Tanzania. The study period was divided in three audit blocks; retrospective (before auditing), prospective 1 and prospective 2. A local audit panel (LP) and an external auditor (EA) judged if obstetric management was adequate and indications were appropriate or if CS could have been prevented and yet retain good pregnancy outcome. Furthermore, changes in modes of deliveries, overall pregnancy outcome and decision-to-delivery interval were monitored.
During the study period there were 1868 deliveries. Of these, 403 (21.6%) were Caesarean sections. The proportions of unjustified CS prior to introduction of audit were as high as 34 and 75%, according to the respective judgments of LP and EA. Following introduction of audit, the proportions of unjustified CS decreased to 23% (p = 0.29) and 52% (p = 0.01) according to LP and EA respectively. However, CS rate did not change (20.2 to 21.7%), assisted vacuum delivery rate did not increase (3.9 to 1.8%) and median decision-to-delivery interval was 83 min (range 10 - 390 min).
Although this is a single center study, these findings suggest that unnecessary Caesarean sections exist at an alarming rate even in referral hospitals and suggest that a vast number can be averted by introducing a focused CS audit system. Our findings indicate that CS audit is a useful tool and, if well implemented, can enhance rational use of resources, improve decision-making and harmonise practice among care providers.
剖宫产术通常是一种挽救生命的手术,但也可能导致严重并发症,在资源匮乏地区更是如此。因此,应避免不必要的剖宫产,并创造阴道分娩的最佳条件。在本研究中,我们旨在审查剖宫产的指征,改善决策制定和产科管理。
对坦桑尼亚一家农村转诊医院2013年1月至8月期间进行的所有剖宫产病例进行审查。研究期分为三个审查阶段:回顾性(审查前)、前瞻性1和前瞻性2。由当地审查小组(LP)和外部审计员(EA)判断产科管理是否充分、指征是否恰当,或者剖宫产是否可以避免且仍能保持良好的妊娠结局。此外,还监测了分娩方式的变化、总体妊娠结局以及决定分娩间隔时间。
在研究期间,共有1868例分娩。其中,403例(21.6%)为剖宫产。根据LP和EA各自的判断,在引入审查之前,不合理剖宫产的比例分别高达34%和75%。引入审查后,根据LP和EA的判断,不合理剖宫产的比例分别降至23%(p = 0.29)和52%(p = 0.01)。然而,剖宫产率没有变化(20.2%至21.7%),辅助真空分娩率没有增加(3.9%至1.8%),决定分娩间隔时间的中位数为83分钟(范围为10 - 390分钟)。
尽管这是一项单中心研究,但这些结果表明,即使在转诊医院,不必要的剖宫产率也高得惊人,这表明引入有针对性的剖宫产审查系统可以避免大量不必要的剖宫产。我们的研究结果表明,剖宫产审查是一种有用的工具,如果实施得当,可以提高资源的合理利用,改善决策制定,并使护理人员之间的实践更加协调一致。