University of California Irvine, School of Medicine, United States.
University of California Irvine, Department of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, United States.
J Psychosom Res. 2018 Jul;110:46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.03.010. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
The relationship between psychological stress and breast cancer risk is unclear. The present study sought to understand how stressfulness appraisal of salient Life Events (LEs) influences breast cancer risk.
A case-control design was used and included 664 female cases identified through the Cancer Surveillance Program of Orange County, CA and 203 female population-based controls. A LE questionnaire determined if events occurred prior to breast cancer diagnosis and if these events were considered to be stressful or not. Multivariate unconditional logistic regression was used to calculate ORs while adjusting for known breast cancer covariates.
Cumulative adverse LEs perceived as stressful were associated with increased breast cancer risk in a dose response fashion (OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.00-2.66, P = 0.045). Conversely, events perceived as non-stressful did not have a significant impact on breast cancer risk. Previous personal illness was directly related to increased breast cancer risk, whether perceived as stressful (OR = 2.84, 95% CI = 1.96-4.11) or non-stressful (OR = 3.47, 95% CI = 1.34-8.94). Abortion and relocation were observed to have a protective effect on breast cancer risk only when reported as stressful (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.32-0.92; OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.43-0.93, respectively). Pre/Peri-menopausal women who were nulliparous or who had their first child at ≥30 years of age were especially prone to the effects of appraised stress on increased breast cancer risk.
This study underscores the importance of stressfulness appraisal when determining the effect of major LEs on breast cancer risk. Our results support incorporating assessments of perceived stressfulness in future epidemiological investigation of this topic.
心理压力与乳腺癌风险之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在了解重要生活事件(LEs)的应激评估如何影响乳腺癌风险。
采用病例对照设计,包括通过加利福尼亚州奥兰治县癌症监测计划确定的 664 名女性病例和 203 名基于人群的女性对照。LE 问卷确定事件是否发生在乳腺癌诊断之前,以及这些事件是否被认为是有压力的。多变量非条件逻辑回归用于计算 OR,同时调整已知的乳腺癌协变量。
累积的被认为是有压力的不良 LEs 与乳腺癌风险呈剂量反应关系(OR=1.63,95%CI=1.00-2.66,P=0.045)。相反,被认为是非压力的事件对乳腺癌风险没有显著影响。以前的个人疾病与乳腺癌风险增加直接相关,无论被认为是有压力的(OR=2.84,95%CI=1.96-4.11)还是非压力的(OR=3.47,95%CI=1.34-8.94)。仅当报告为有压力时,堕胎和搬迁才观察到对乳腺癌风险有保护作用(OR=0.54,95%CI=0.32-0.92;OR=0.63,95%CI=0.43-0.93)。绝经前/围绝经期的未生育或 30 岁以上首次生育的妇女尤其容易受到评估的压力对增加的乳腺癌风险的影响。
本研究强调了在确定重大 LEs 对乳腺癌风险的影响时,应激评估的重要性。我们的研究结果支持在未来对这一主题的流行病学研究中纳入对感知压力的评估。