DeCaro Daniel A, Chaffin Brian C, Schlager Edella, Garmestani Ahjond S, Ruhl J B
Department of Urban and Public Affairs, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY USA.
College of Forestry & Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
Ecol Soc. 2017 Mar 17;22(1):1-32. doi: 10.5751/ES-09036-220132.
Legal and institutional structures fundamentally shape opportunities for adaptive governance of environmental resources at multiple ecological and societal scales. Properties of adaptive governance are widely studied. However, these studies have not resulted in consolidated frameworks for legal and institutional design, limiting our ability to promote adaptation and social-ecological resilience. We develop an overarching framework that describes the current and potential role of law in enabling adaptation. We apply this framework to different social-ecological settings, centers of activity, and scales, illustrating the multidimensional and polycentric nature of water governance. Adaptation typically emerges organically among multiple centers of agency and authority in society as a relatively self-organized or autonomous process marked by innovation, social learning, and political deliberation. This self-directed and emergent process is difficult to create in an exogenous, top-down fashion. However, traditional centers of authority may establish enabling conditions for adaptation using a suite of legal, economic, and democratic tools to legitimize and facilitate self-organization, coordination, and collaboration across scales. The principles outlined here provide preliminary legal and institutional foundations for adaptive environmental governance, which may inform institutional design and guide future scholarship.
法律和制度结构从根本上塑造了在多个生态和社会尺度上对环境资源进行适应性治理的机会。适应性治理的特性得到了广泛研究。然而,这些研究并未形成用于法律和制度设计的综合框架,限制了我们促进适应以及社会生态恢复力的能力。我们构建了一个总体框架,该框架描述了法律在促进适应方面的当前及潜在作用。我们将此框架应用于不同的社会生态环境、活动中心及尺度,阐明了水治理的多维度和多中心性质。适应通常在社会中多个行动和权威中心之间以相对自我组织或自主的过程有机出现,其特点是创新、社会学习和政治审议。这种自我导向和自发的过程很难以外生的、自上而下的方式创建。然而,传统权威中心可以利用一系列法律、经济和民主工具建立促进适应的条件,以使跨尺度的自我组织、协调和合作合法化并为之提供便利。这里概述的原则为适应性环境治理提供了初步的法律和制度基础,这可能为制度设计提供参考并指导未来的学术研究。