Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Surg. 2018 Sep 1;153(9):791-799. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1099.
Several national initiatives have emerged to empower laypersons to act as immediate responders to reduce preventable deaths from uncontrolled bleeding. Point-of-care instructional interventions have been developed in response to the scalability challenges associated with in-person training. However, to our knowledge, their effectiveness for hemorrhage control has not been established.
To evaluate the effectiveness of different instructional point-of-care interventions and in-person training for hemorrhage control compared with no intervention and assess skill retention 3 to 9 months after hemorrhage control training.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial of 465 laypersons was conducted at a professional sports stadium in Massachusetts with capacity for 66 000 people and assessed correct tourniquet application by using different point-of-care interventions (audio kits and flashcards) and a Bleeding Control Basic (B-Con) course. Non-B-Con arms received B-Con training after initial testing (conducted from April 2017 to August 2017). Retesting for 303 participants (65%) was performed 3 to 9 months after training (October 2017 to January 2018) to evaluate B-Con retention. A logistic regression for demographic associations was performed for retention testing.
Participants were randomized into 4 arms: instructional flashcards, audio kits with embedded flashcards, B-Con, and control. All participants received B-Con training to later assess retention.
Correct tourniquet application in a simulated scenario.
Of the 465 participants, 189 (40.7%) were women and the mean (SD) age was 46.3 (16.1) years. For correct tourniquet application, B-Con (88% correct application [n = 122]; P < .001) was superior to control (n = 104 [16%]) while instructional flashcards (n = 117 [19.6%]) and audio kit (n = 122 [23%]) groups were not. More than half of participants in point-of-care arms did not use the educational prompts as intended. Of 303 participants (65%) who were assessed 3 to 9 months after undergoing B-Con training, 165 (54.5%) could correctly apply a tourniquet. Over this period, there was no further skill decay in the adjusted model that treated time as either linear (odds ratio [OR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.95-1.03) or quadratic (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 1.00-1.00). The only demographic that was associated with correct application at retention was age; adults aged 18 to 35 years (n = 58; OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.21-4.72) and aged 35 to 55 years (n = 107; OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.04-3.02) were more likely to be efficacious than those older than 55 years (n = 138).
In-person hemorrhage control training for laypersons is currently the most efficacious means of enabling bystanders to act to control hemorrhage. Laypersons can successfully perform tourniquet application after undergoing a 1-hour course. However, only 54.5% retain this skill after 3 to 9 months, suggesting that investigating refresher training or improved point-of-care instructions is critical.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03479112.
为了减少因控制不住出血导致的可预防死亡,几个国家发起了各种倡议,旨在授权非专业人士作为急救人员。为了应对与现场培训相关的可扩展性挑战,已经开发了即时护理教学干预措施。然而,据我们所知,它们在控制出血方面的有效性尚未得到证实。
评估不同即时护理干预措施和现场培训与无干预措施相比在控制出血方面的效果,并评估在接受控制出血培训 3 至 9 个月后的技能保留情况。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在马萨诸塞州一个可容纳 66000 人的专业体育场进行的 465 名非专业人员的随机临床试验,通过使用不同的即时护理干预措施(音频套件和抽认卡)和 Bleeding Control Basic(B-Con)课程评估正确的止血带应用。非 B-Con 手臂在初次测试后(2017 年 4 月至 2017 年 8 月进行)接受 B-Con 培训。对 303 名(65%)参与者进行了 3 至 9 个月(2017 年 10 月至 2018 年 1 月)的复测,以评估 B-Con 的保留情况。对于保留测试,进行了针对人口统计学关联的逻辑回归。
参与者被随机分为 4 组:教学抽认卡、带有嵌入式抽认卡的音频套件、B-Con 和对照组。所有参与者都接受了 B-Con 培训,以便后来评估保留情况。
模拟场景中正确使用止血带。
在 465 名参与者中,189 名(40.7%)为女性,平均(SD)年龄为 46.3(16.1)岁。在正确使用止血带方面,B-Con(正确应用止血带的人数为 122 人,占 88%[n=122];P<.001)优于对照组(n=104,占 16%),而教学抽认卡组(n=117,占 19.6%)和音频套件组(n=122,占 23%)则不然。半数以上的即时护理组参与者并没有按照预期使用教育提示。在接受 B-Con 培训后 3 至 9 个月接受评估的 303 名(65%)参与者中,165 名(54.5%)能够正确应用止血带。在此期间,在调整后的模型中,时间既被视为线性(优势比[OR],0.98;95%CI,0.95-1.03),也被视为二次(OR,1.00;95%CI,1.00-1.00),都没有进一步的技能衰减。唯一与保留时正确应用相关的人口统计学因素是年龄;年龄在 18 至 35 岁的成年人(n=58;OR,2.39;95%CI,1.21-4.72)和 35 至 55 岁的成年人(n=107;OR,1.77;95%CI,1.04-3.02)比 55 岁以上的成年人(n=138)更有效。
目前,对于非专业人员来说,现场控制出血培训是最有效的使旁观者能够采取行动控制出血的方法。非专业人员在接受 1 小时课程后可以成功进行止血带应用。然而,在 3 至 9 个月后,只有 54.5%的人保留了这种技能,这表明调查重新培训或改进即时护理指导是至关重要的。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03479112。