Kurşun-Çakmak Emine Şebnem, Bayrak Seval
Türkiye Public Hospitals Agency, Ministry of Health, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abant İzzet Baysal University, Dentistry Faculty, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Bolu, Turkey.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018 Aug;126(2):184-191. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 May 3.
This study compared the fractal dimension (FD) and radiomorphometric indices in the assessment of mandibular bone of patients with type 1 (T1 DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2 DM).
Panoramic radiographs of 104 patients were evaluated to calculate FD, mandibular cortical width (MCW), panoramic mandibular index (PMI), and mandibular cortical index (MCI) in the mandible.
No statistically significant differences were found in FD when T1 DM and T2 DM groups were compared with controls (P ≥ .168). Patients with T1 DM had significantly lower MCW (P < .001) and PMI (P = .030) compared with controls. Patients with T2 DM had no significant differences in MCW (P = .228) or PMI (P = .137) compared with controls. No significant differences were observed between patients with T1 DM and those with T2 DM for FD, MCW, and PMI (P > .05). In the T1 DM and T2 DM groups, there was a significant correlation between MCW and FD (P ≤ .011). No correlation was observed between FD and PMI in either the T1 DM group or the T2 DM group (P ≥ .142). No significant differences in MCI were observed between the DM groups and controls (P = .740) or between the T1 DM and T2 DM groups (P = 1.000).
The cortical and trabecular bone architectures of patients with T1 DM and T2 DM were not different. Patients with T1 DM had lower cortical measurements compared with controls.
本研究比较了1型糖尿病(T1 DM)和2型糖尿病(T2 DM)患者下颌骨评估中的分形维数(FD)和放射形态计量学指标。
对104例患者的全景X线片进行评估,以计算下颌骨的FD、下颌骨皮质宽度(MCW)、全景下颌指数(PMI)和下颌骨皮质指数(MCI)。
将T1 DM组和T2 DM组与对照组比较时,FD无统计学显著差异(P≥0.168)。与对照组相比,T1 DM患者的MCW(P<0.001)和PMI(P=0.030)显著更低。与对照组相比,T2 DM患者的MCW(P=0.228)或PMI(P=0.137)无显著差异。T1 DM患者与T2 DM患者在FD、MCW和PMI方面未观察到显著差异(P>0.05)。在T1 DM组和T2 DM组中,MCW与FD之间存在显著相关性(P≤0.011)。在T1 DM组或T2 DM组中,FD与PMI之间均未观察到相关性(P≥0.142)。DM组与对照组之间(P=0.740)或T1 DM组与T2 DM组之间(P=1.000)的MCI无显著差异。
T1 DM和T2 DM患者的皮质骨和小梁骨结构无差异。与对照组相比,T1 DM患者的皮质骨测量值更低。