Scientific Directorate,Azienda USL - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia,Reggio Emilia,Italy.
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda,Milano,Lombardia,Italy.
Palliat Support Care. 2019 Feb;17(1):107-118. doi: 10.1017/S1478951518000172. Epub 2018 May 29.
Qualitative research is pivotal in gaining understanding of individuals' experiences in pediatric palliative care. In the past few decades, the number of qualitative studies on pediatric palliative care has increased slightly, as has interest in qualitative research in this area. Nonetheless, a limited number of such studies have included the first-person perspective of children. The aim of this article is to understand the contribution of previous qualitative research on pediatric palliative care that included the voices of children.
A systematic review of qualitative studies and a meta-summary were conducted. MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, and ERIC were searched without limitations on publication date or language. Eligible articles were qualitative research articles in which the participants were children ranging in age from 3 to 18 years.ResultWe retrieved 16 qualitative research articles reporting on 12 unique studies, and we selected two mixed-method articles. The meta-summary shows eight themes: the relationship with professional caregivers, pain and its management, "living beyond pain," the relationship between pediatric patients and their families, children's view on their treatment and service provision, meanings children give to their end-of-life situation, consequences of clinical decisions, and the relationships among children in pediatric palliative care and their peers.Significance of resultsThis meta-summary presents the "state of the art" of pediatric palliative care qualitative research on children and highlights additional research areas that warrant qualitative study.
定性研究对于了解儿科姑息治疗中个体的体验至关重要。在过去的几十年中,儿科姑息治疗的定性研究数量略有增加,人们对该领域定性研究的兴趣也有所增加。尽管如此,此类研究中很少有包含儿童第一人称视角的研究。本文旨在了解纳入儿童声音的儿科姑息治疗先前定性研究的贡献。
对定性研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析总结。无出版日期或语言限制地在 MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、PsycARTICLES 和 ERIC 中进行了搜索。合格的文章是定性研究文章,其中参与者为年龄在 3 至 18 岁之间的儿童。
我们检索到 16 篇定性研究报告了 12 项独特的研究,并选择了 2 篇混合方法文章。荟萃分析总结了八个主题:与专业护理人员的关系、疼痛及其管理、“超越疼痛生活”、儿科患者及其家庭之间的关系、儿童对其治疗和服务提供的看法、儿童赋予其临终情况的意义、临床决策的后果以及儿科姑息治疗中儿童之间的关系及其同伴。
本荟萃分析介绍了儿科姑息治疗中儿童定性研究的“现状”,并强调了需要进行定性研究的其他研究领域。