Valencia-Ramos Juan, Mirás Alicia, Cilla Amacia, Ochoa Carlos, Arnaez Juan
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Centro Hospitalario Burgo, Burgos, Spain.
Department of Pediatrics, Centro Hospitalario Burgos, Burgos, Spain.
Respir Care. 2018 Jul;63(7):886-893. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05880. Epub 2018 May 29.
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is increasingly used to provide respiratory support in infants with bronchiolitis. The delivery of aerosol therapy through a jet nebulizer is widely indicated despite its controversial efficacy and poor tolerability.
This randomized cross-over study aimed to evaluate the comfort and satisfaction of the delivery of aerosol therapy using a nebulization system integrated into HFNC compared with the standard practice of using a jet nebulizer with a face mask. The COMFORT-Behavior (COMFORT-B) scale, a visual analog scale, and a numeric rating scale were used by health professionals and caregivers to assess subjects' levels of comfort and satisfaction.
A total of 113 nebulizations (64 via nebulizer with HFNC; 49 via jet nebulizer) were delivered to the 6 subjects included in the study. Use of the nebulizer with HFNC showed increased comfort and satisfaction during nebulization compared to use of the jet nebulizer, as measured by the COMFORT-B scale, the visual analog scale, and the numeric rating scale, with the following median (interquartile range) scores: 10.7 (7-16) versus 14.5 (10-20) ( = .006), 8.5 (6-10) versus 7 (4-9) ( = .02), and 3.84 (3.61-4.07) versus 1.83 (1.58-2.08) ( < .001), respectively. Correlation between the COMFORT-B scale and the visual analog scale using Spearman's rho was -0.757 ( < .001). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the COMFORT-B scale, visual analog scale, and numeric rating scale, as measured by 2 different nurses, was between 0.75 and 0.87.
The use of a nebulizer incorporated into HFNC therapy results in an increased level of comfort and satisfaction compared to the use of a conventional jet nebulizer in subjects with bronchiolitis who required HFNC therapy. Further studies are needed to determine whether aerosol therapy delivered through HFNC improves the clinical course of this pathology.
高流量鼻导管(HFNC)越来越多地用于为患有细支气管炎的婴儿提供呼吸支持。尽管其疗效存在争议且耐受性较差,但通过喷射雾化器进行雾化治疗仍被广泛应用。
本随机交叉研究旨在评估与使用带面罩的喷射雾化器的标准做法相比,使用集成在HFNC中的雾化系统进行雾化治疗的舒适度和满意度。健康专业人员和护理人员使用舒适行为(COMFORT-B)量表、视觉模拟量表和数字评分量表来评估受试者的舒适度和满意度水平。
共对研究纳入的6名受试者进行了113次雾化治疗(64次通过带HFNC的雾化器;49次通过喷射雾化器)。与使用喷射雾化器相比,使用带HFNC的雾化器在雾化过程中显示出更高的舒适度和满意度,通过COMFORT-B量表、视觉模拟量表和数字评分量表测量,其以下中位数(四分位间距)得分分别为:10.7(7-16)对14.5(10-20)(P = 0.006),8.5(6-10)对7(4-9)(P = 0.02),以及3.84(3.61-4.07)对1.83(1.58-2.08)(P < 0.001)。使用Spearman秩相关系数,COMFORT-B量表与视觉模拟量表之间的相关性为-0.757(P < 0.001)。由两名不同护士测量的COMFORT-B量表、视觉模拟量表和数字评分量表的组内相关系数在0.75至0.87之间。
对于需要HFNC治疗的细支气管炎患者,与使用传统喷射雾化器相比,在HFNC治疗中使用雾化器可提高舒适度和满意度。需要进一步研究以确定通过HFNC进行的雾化治疗是否能改善这种疾病的临床病程。