Gazerani Parisa, Cairns Brian Edwin
a Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine , Aalborg University , Aalborg East , Denmark.
b Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences , The University of British Columbia , Vancouver , Canada.
Somatosens Mot Res. 2018 Jun;35(2):86-94. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2018.1473246. Epub 2018 May 30.
Previous research findings have suggested an important role for acid sensing ion channels (ASICs) in muscle pain mechanisms. This study was conducted to determine if masticatory muscle afferent fibres express ASICs, if there are sex differences in this expression, and to compare the effects of low pH and hypertonic saline on afferent fibres that innervate the masticatory muscle in vivo. Immunohistochemistry methods were applied to examine the expression of ASICs in trigeminal ganglion neurons, while in vivo electrophysiology techniques were employed to examine changes in masticatory muscle afferent fibre excitability. Both ASIC and ASIC were expressed by predominantly larger masticatory muscle ganglion neurons, but the frequency of ASIC expression (56%) was significantly greater than ASIC (35%). No sex-related differences in expression were identified. Injection of pH 5.8, but not pH 6.8, phosphate buffered saline evoked afferent discharges that were significantly greater than those evoked by pH 7.4 buffer (control). Since ASIC channels are not activated until the pH is around 6, these results indicate that activation of both channels contributes to excitation of masticatory muscle afferent fibres. The results further show that many masticatory muscle afferent fibres, which respond to low pH, are low threshold mechanoreceptors. These findings may explain why injection of low pH solutions into the masticatory muscles of healthy humans is not associated with significant muscle pain.
先前的研究结果表明酸敏感离子通道(ASICs)在肌肉疼痛机制中起重要作用。本研究旨在确定咀嚼肌传入纤维是否表达ASICs,这种表达是否存在性别差异,并比较低pH值和高渗盐水对体内支配咀嚼肌的传入纤维的影响。采用免疫组织化学方法检测三叉神经节神经元中ASICs的表达,同时采用体内电生理技术检测咀嚼肌传入纤维兴奋性的变化。ASIC1和ASIC2主要由较大的咀嚼肌神经节神经元表达,但ASIC1的表达频率(56%)显著高于ASIC2(35%)。未发现与性别相关的表达差异。注射pH 5.8而非pH 6.8的磷酸盐缓冲盐水诱发的传入放电明显大于pH 7.4缓冲液(对照)诱发的传入放电。由于ASIC通道直到pH值约为6时才被激活,这些结果表明两种通道的激活都有助于咀嚼肌传入纤维的兴奋。结果还进一步表明,许多对低pH值有反应的咀嚼肌传入纤维是低阈值机械感受器。这些发现可能解释了为什么向健康人的咀嚼肌注射低pH值溶液不会引起明显的肌肉疼痛。