Author's response to invited commentary "a perspective on the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Composite Score for evaluating esophagectomy for esophageal cancer".
作者信息
Chang Andrew C
机构信息
Department of Surgery, Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
出版信息
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Apr;10(Suppl 9):S1129-S1130. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.96.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Author's response to invited commentary "a perspective on the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Composite Score for evaluating esophagectomy for esophageal cancer".
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Apr;10(Suppl 9):S1129-S1130. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.96.
2
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Composite Score for Evaluating Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 May;103(5):1661-1667. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.10.027. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
3
A perspective on the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Composite Score for evaluating esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jan;10(1):94-97. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.12.114.
4
Predictors of Major Morbidity or Mortality After Resection for Esophageal Cancer: A Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database Risk Adjustment Model.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jul;102(1):207-14. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.04.055. Epub 2016 May 28.
5
Worldwide trends in surgical techniques in the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer.
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Jan 1;30(1):1-7. doi: 10.1111/dote.12480.
6
International survey on esophageal cancer: part I surgical techniques.
Dis Esophagus. 2009;22(3):195-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2008.00929.x. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
7
Restrictive Transfusion Practices After Esophagectomy Are Associated With Improved Outcome: A Review of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Database.
Ann Surg. 2018 May;267(5):886-891. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002231.
8
Trends in the management of esophageal carcinoma based on provider volume: treatment practices of 618 esophageal surgeons.
Dis Esophagus. 2010 Feb;23(2):136-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.00985.x. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
9
Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis For Esophagectomy: A Survey of Practice Patterns Among Thoracic Surgeons.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Feb;101(2):489-94. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.07.023. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
10
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Comparison of Early Surgical Outcomes From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Apr;101(4):1281-8; discussion 1288-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.095. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
本文引用的文献
1
A perspective on the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Composite Score for evaluating esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jan;10(1):94-97. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.12.114.
2
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Composite Score for Evaluating Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 May;103(5):1661-1667. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.10.027. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
3
Are there negative consequences of public reporting? The hype and the reality.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Apr;153(4):908-911. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.01.034. Epub 2017 Feb 5.
4
Public reporting: Will this help inform what patients and families need to know?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Jun;153(6):1623-1626. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
5
Predictors of Major Morbidity or Mortality After Resection for Esophageal Cancer: A Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database Risk Adjustment Model.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jul;102(1):207-14. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.04.055. Epub 2016 May 28.
6
Penetration, Completeness, and Representativeness of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jan;101(1):33-41; discussion 41. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.08.055. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
7
STS database risk models: predictors of mortality and major morbidity for lung cancer resection.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Sep;90(3):875-81; discussion 881-3. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.115.
Zotero 插件