Suppr超能文献

使用模型健康政策可能不会增加书面学校健康政策的力度和全面性。

Use of a Model Wellness Policy May Not Increase the Strength and Comprehensiveness of Written School Wellness Policies.

机构信息

Health and Nutritional Sciences Department, South Dakota State University, Intramural Building 116 Box 2203, Brookings, SD 57007.

Department of Health & Nutritional Sciences, South Dakota State University, Box 2203 SWG 449, Brookings, SD 57007.

出版信息

J Sch Health. 2018 Jul;88(7):516-523. doi: 10.1111/josh.12635.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many state agencies have developed model wellness policies (MWPs) to serve as examples for schools when writing their own school wellness policy (SWP). The purpose of this study was to evaluate if a MWP aids schools in writing stronger, more comprehensive SWPs.

METHODS

For this cross-sectional study, 91 school districts submitted their current SWP and completed a survey that classified districts into either districts that utilized the state MWP (N = 56; 61.5%) or those that did not (NMWP, N =35; 38.5%). The Wellness School Assessment Tool (WellSAT) was used to assess the strength, comprehensiveness, total overall score, and subsection scores of each policy. Dependent variables were compared between groups using t tests. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ .05. Data are presented as mean ±SD.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between groups in total overall (MWP 76.8 ± 37.9; NMWP 62.1 ± 34.3), strength (MWP 25.3 ± 17.6; NMWP 19.1 ± 12.8), or comprehensiveness scores (MWP 51.5 ± 21.2; NMWP 43.0 ± 22.1). The only subsection score difference identified between groups was the Nutrition Standards comprehension score (p = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest MWPs may not improve the quality of written SWPs. Further research is needed to better understand the needs of school districts in SWP development.

摘要

背景

许多州机构已经制定了模式健康政策(MWP),作为学校制定自己的学校健康政策(SWP)的范例。本研究的目的是评估 MWP 是否有助于学校制定更有力、更全面的 SWP。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,91 个学区提交了他们当前的 SWP,并完成了一项调查,该调查将学区分为使用州 MWP 的学区(N=56;61.5%)或未使用 MWP 的学区(NMWP,N=35;38.5%)。使用健康学校评估工具(WellSAT)评估每个政策的强度、全面性、总分和子项分数。使用 t 检验比较组间的因变量。统计学意义设定为 p≤0.05。数据以平均值±SD 表示。

结果

在总分(MWP 76.8±37.9;NMWP 62.1±34.3)、强度(MWP 25.3±17.6;NMWP 19.1±12.8)或全面性得分(MWP 51.5±21.2;NMWP 43.0±22.1)方面,两组之间没有发现显著差异。唯一确定的子项评分差异是营养标准理解评分(p=0.02)。

结论

这些数据表明 MWP 可能不会提高书面 SWP 的质量。需要进一步研究以更好地了解学区在 SWP 制定方面的需求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验