Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer, and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)-University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
Biochem Soc Trans. 2018 Jun 19;46(3):741-760. doi: 10.1042/BST20170531. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
RHO GTPases have been traditionally associated with protumorigenic functions. While this paradigm is still valid in many cases, recent data have unexpectedly revealed that RHO proteins can also play tumor suppressor roles. RHO signaling elements can also promote both pro- and antitumorigenic effects using GTPase-independent mechanisms, thus giving an extra layer of complexity to the role of these proteins in cancer. Consistent with these variegated roles, both gain- and loss-of-function mutations in RHO pathway genes have been found in cancer patients. Collectively, these observations challenge long-held functional archetypes for RHO proteins in both normal and cancer cells. In this review, I will summarize these data and discuss new questions arising from them such as the functional and clinical relevance of the mutations found in patients, the mechanistic orchestration of those antagonistic functions in tumors, and the pros and cons that these results represent for the development of RHO-based anticancer drugs.
RHO GTPases 传统上与促进肿瘤发生的功能相关。虽然这一范式在许多情况下仍然适用,但最近的数据出人意料地揭示了 RHO 蛋白也可以发挥肿瘤抑制作用。RHO 信号元件还可以通过非 GTPase 依赖机制促进促肿瘤发生和抗肿瘤发生的作用,从而为这些蛋白质在癌症中的作用增加了一层复杂性。与这些多样化的作用一致,在癌症患者中发现了 RHO 途径基因的获得和功能丧失突变。总的来说,这些观察结果挑战了 RHO 蛋白在正常和癌细胞中的长期功能原型。在这篇综述中,我将总结这些数据,并讨论由此产生的新问题,例如在患者中发现的突变的功能和临床相关性、在肿瘤中这些拮抗功能的机制协调,以及这些结果对基于 RHO 的抗癌药物开发的利弊。