1 National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, UK.
2 Department of Public Health, University of Ghent, Belgium.
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018 Aug;25(12):1242-1251. doi: 10.1177/2047487318781359. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
Aim The purpose of this study was to describe the proportions of patients referred to and attending cardiac rehabilitation programmes in Europe and to compare lifestyle and risk factor targets achieved according to participation in a cardiac rehabilitation programme. Methods The EUROASPIRE IV cross-sectional survey was undertaken in 78 centres from 24 European countries. Consecutive patients aged <80 years with acute coronary syndromes and/or revascularization procedures were interviewed at least six months after their event. Results A total of 7998 patients (24% females) were interviewed. Overall, 51% were advised to participate in a cardiac rehabilitation programme and 81% of them attended at least half of the sessions; being 41% of the study population. Older patients, women, those at low socio-economic status or enrolled with percutaneous coronary intervention and unstable angina, as well as those with a previous history of coronary disease, heart failure, hypertension or dysglycaemia were less likely to be advised to follow a cardiac rehabilitation programme. People smoking prior to the recruiting event were less likely to participate. The proportions of patients achieving lifestyle targets were higher in the cardiac rehabilitation programme group as compared to the non-cardiac rehabilitation programme group: stopping smoking (57% vs 47%, p < 0.0001), recommended physical activity levels (47% vs 38%, p < 0.0001) and body mass index<30 kg/m (65% vs 61%, p=0.0007). However, there were no differences in the blood pressure, lipids and glucose control. Patients who attended a cardiac rehabilitation programme had significantly lower anxiety and depression scores and better medication adherence. Conclusions Only half of all coronary patients were referred and a minority attended a cardiac rehabilitation programme. Those attending were more likely to achieve lifestyle targets, had lower depression and anxiety, and better medication adherence. There is still considerable potential to further reduce cardiovascular risk by increasing uptake and fully integrating secondary prevention and cardiac rehabilitation to provide a modern preventive cardiology programme.
目的 本研究旨在描述在欧洲被转诊至并参加心脏康复计划的患者比例,并比较根据是否参加心脏康复计划,实现的生活方式和风险因素目标。 方法 EUROASPIRE IV 是一项在欧洲 24 个国家的 78 个中心进行的横断面调查。对至少在急性冠脉综合征和/或血运重建术后 6 个月的年龄<80 岁的连续患者进行了访谈。 结果 共访谈了 7998 例患者(24%为女性)。总体而言,51%的患者被建议参加心脏康复计划,其中 81%的患者至少参加了一半的课程;占研究人群的 41%。年龄较大、女性、社会经济地位较低或接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和不稳定型心绞痛的患者,以及有先前冠心病、心力衰竭、高血压或糖尿病病史的患者,不太可能被建议参加心脏康复计划。在招募事件前吸烟的患者更不可能参加。与非心脏康复计划组相比,参加心脏康复计划的患者达到生活方式目标的比例更高:戒烟(57%比 47%,p<0.0001)、推荐的体力活动水平(47%比 38%,p<0.0001)和体重指数<30kg/m(65%比 61%,p=0.0007)。然而,血压、血脂和血糖控制方面没有差异。参加心脏康复计划的患者焦虑和抑郁评分显著降低,药物依从性更好。 结论 只有一半的冠心病患者被转诊,只有少数人参加了心脏康复计划。参加者更有可能实现生活方式目标,抑郁和焦虑程度更低,药物依从性更好。通过增加接受度并充分整合二级预防和心脏康复,提供现代预防心脏病学计划,进一步降低心血管风险仍有很大潜力。