Luong Emilie, Shayegan Amir
Department of Children and Adult Operative Dentistry, César de Paepe Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Department of Children and Adult Operative Dentistry, Children's Hospital of Queen Fabiola, Free University of Brussels, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2018 May 30;10:83-92. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S153989. eCollection 2018.
The aim of this study was to make a comparison between microleakage of conventionally restored class V cavities using acid etchant and the ones conditioned by erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser, and also to assess and compare the effectiveness of enamel surface treatments of occlusal pits and fissures by acid etching and conditioned by Er:YAG laser-etch.
Seventy-two extracted third molars were used in this study. The samples were divided into two major groups: class V cavities and pit and fissure sealants. Each subgroup was divided into conventional acid etching, Er:YAG laser conditioning and conventional acid etching, and combination with Er:YAG laser conditioning (n=12). The teeth were placed in 2% methylene blue dye solution, were sectioned, and were evaluated according to the dye penetration criteria. Two samples per subgroup were chosen for scanning electron microscopic (SEM) analysis.
There was a significant difference between occlusal and cervical margin groups. Laser conventional composite cementum group showed more microleakage values compared to other groups. There was no significant difference between occlusal margin groups. However, there was a significant difference between cervical margin groups in terms of microleakage. In sealant groups, there was a significant difference between laser and conventional with/without laser treatment groups in terms of microleakage.
Based on the results reported in this study, it can be concluded that the application of the Er:YAG laser beneath the resin composite, the resin-modified glass ionomers (GIs), and the fissure sealant placement may be an alternative enamel and dentin etching method to acid etching.
本研究旨在比较使用酸蚀剂常规修复Ⅴ类洞的微渗漏情况与经掺铒钇铝石榴石(Er:YAG)激光预处理的Ⅴ类洞的微渗漏情况,同时评估和比较酸蚀与Er:YAG激光蚀刻对咬合面窝沟釉质表面处理的效果。
本研究使用72颗拔除的第三磨牙。样本分为两个主要组:Ⅴ类洞组和窝沟封闭剂组。每个亚组又分为常规酸蚀、Er:YAG激光预处理以及常规酸蚀与Er:YAG激光预处理联合组(n = 12)。将牙齿置于2%亚甲蓝染料溶液中,进行切片,并根据染料渗透标准进行评估。每个亚组选取两个样本进行扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析。
咬合面边缘组和颈部边缘组之间存在显著差异。激光 - 常规复合牙骨质组与其他组相比显示出更多的微渗漏值。咬合面边缘组之间无显著差异。然而,颈部边缘组在微渗漏方面存在显著差异。在封闭剂组中,激光处理组与常规处理组(有无激光处理)在微渗漏方面存在显著差异。
基于本研究报告的结果,可以得出结论,在树脂复合材料、树脂改性玻璃离子体(GIs)下方应用Er:YAG激光以及放置窝沟封闭剂可能是一种替代酸蚀的釉质和牙本质蚀刻方法。