Suppr超能文献

一种将骨-髌腱-骨移植物固定于胫骨的吻合器固定替代方法的生物力学评估。

Biomechanical assessment of an alternative method of staple fixation for anchoring the Bone Patellar Tendon Bone graft to the tibia.

作者信息

Matthai Thomas, George Vinu M, Rao Anbu S, Oommen Anil T, Korula Ravi J, Devasahayam Suresh, Poonnoose Pradeep M

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632004, India.

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632004, India.

出版信息

J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018 Apr-Jun;9(2):157-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Apr 18.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most commonly injured ligament around the knee and is best reconstructed with a biological graft. For ideal graft fixation, there should be sufficient initial strength to avoid failure of fixation and sufficient stiffness to restore the stability of the knee and to avoid gradual loosening in the post-operative period.When considering fixation of Bone Patellar Tendon Bone (BPTB) grafts to the tibia, the interference screw is considered to be the gold standard. As an alternative, we have used of staples and stainless steel (SS) wire to anchor the BPTB graft to the tibia and femur. The aim of this study was to assess the biomechanical efficacy of this fixation technique for anchoring the BPTB graft to the proximal tibia. We used a bovine model to compare three fixation techniques -interference screw, braided polyester sutures tied to a screw post and SS wire tied to a staple.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen fresh bovine knees specimens were used for the study. The patella was fixed to a load cell and the construct was pre-tensioned to 40N to allow for creep of the tendon. The BPTB graft was fixed to the tibia using the three fixation techniques - the interference screw, polyester suture tied to a post, and SS wire anchored to a staple. After fixation, the graft was subjected to a single load to failure test, and the forces generated were recorded. The ultimate failure load (the pullout strength), stiffness, and mode of failure were noted.

RESULTS

In the single load-to-failure biomechanical testing, and for Staple with SS wire were 726.40N and 61.9N/mm respectively. For the screw post and polyester suture, it was 733.20N and 53.22N/mm, and for Interference screw - 594.00N and 79.50 N/mm respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the stiffness or ultimate failure load between the three fixation techniques. The graft fixation using interference screws failed at the bone- tunnel interface by slippage of the bone block from the tunnel in all 5 specimens. In all 5 of the specimens fixed with polyester suture and the screw post, the fixation failed when the polyester suture snapped. When the SS wire and staple construct was stressed, the graft failed as the SS wire cut through the graft in 4 specimens, and in the fifth construct, the knot over the staple unraveled as the load was applied.

CONCLUSION

The biomechanical properties of BPTB graft fixation with SS wire tied to a staple is similar to that of other fixation devices like the interference screw and suture post. This technique provides a simple, yet effective fixation for the graft - but needs further clinical assessment.

摘要

引言

前交叉韧带(ACL)是膝关节周围最常受伤的韧带,最好用生物移植物进行重建。为实现理想的移植物固定,应具备足够的初始强度以避免固定失败,以及足够的刚度以恢复膝关节的稳定性并避免术后逐渐松动。在考虑将骨-髌腱-骨(BPTB)移植物固定于胫骨时,干涉螺钉被认为是金标准。作为一种替代方法,我们使用吻合钉和不锈钢(SS)丝将BPTB移植物固定于胫骨和股骨。本研究的目的是评估这种将BPTB移植物固定于胫骨近端的固定技术的生物力学效果。我们使用牛模型比较三种固定技术——干涉螺钉、编织聚酯缝线系于螺钉柱以及SS丝系于吻合钉。

材料与方法

15个新鲜牛膝关节标本用于本研究。将髌骨固定于测力传感器,并将结构预张紧至40N以适应肌腱的蠕变。使用三种固定技术将BPTB移植物固定于胫骨——干涉螺钉、聚酯缝线系于柱以及SS丝固定于吻合钉。固定后,对移植物进行单次破坏载荷试验,并记录产生的力。记录极限破坏载荷(拔出强度)、刚度和破坏模式。

结果

在单次破坏载荷生物力学测试中,吻合钉加SS丝的极限破坏载荷和刚度分别为726.40N和61.9N/mm。螺钉柱加聚酯缝线的分别为733.20N和53.22N/mm,干涉螺钉的分别为594.00N和79.50N/mm。三种固定技术在刚度或极限破坏载荷方面无统计学显著差异。使用干涉螺钉固定的移植物在所有5个标本中均在骨隧道界面因骨块从隧道中滑脱而失败。在用聚酯缝线和螺钉柱固定的所有5个标本中,当聚酯缝线断裂时固定失败。当对SS丝和吻合钉结构施加应力时,在4个标本中移植物因SS丝切断移植物而失败,在第5个结构中,施加载荷时吻合钉上的结松开。

结论

用SS丝系于吻合钉固定BPTB移植物的生物力学特性与干涉螺钉和缝线柱等其他固定装置相似。该技术为移植物提供了一种简单而有效的固定方法——但需要进一步的临床评估。

相似文献

1
Biomechanical assessment of an alternative method of staple fixation for anchoring the Bone Patellar Tendon Bone graft to the tibia.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018 Apr-Jun;9(2):157-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
5
Biomechanical comparison of patellar fixation techniques in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):195-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546514550992. Epub 2014 Sep 26.

本文引用的文献

3
A randomized comparison of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Am J Sports Med. 2003 Jul-Aug;31(4):564-73. doi: 10.1177/03635465030310041501.
6
Anatomy and biomechanics of the anterior cruciate ligament.
Orthop Clin North Am. 2002 Oct;33(4):605-20, v. doi: 10.1016/s0030-5898(02)00010-x.
7
Patellar versus hamstring tendons in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis.
Arthroscopy. 2001 Mar;17(3):248-257. doi: 10.1053/jars.2001.21242.
10
Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part 1: Biology and biomechanics of reconstruction.
Am J Sports Med. 1999 Nov-Dec;27(6):821-30. doi: 10.1177/03635465990270062501.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验