QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Immunology. 2018 Oct;155(2):176-185. doi: 10.1111/imm.12971. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
Type I interferons (IFNs) are a family of cytokines with a wide range of biological activities including anti-viral and immune-regulatory functions. Here, we focus on the protozoan parasitic disease malaria, and examine the effects of type I IFN-signalling during Plasmodium infection of humans and experimental mice. Since the 1960s, there have been many studies in this area, but a simple explanation for the role of type I IFN has not emerged. Although epidemiological data are consistent with roles for type I IFN in influencing malaria disease severity, functional proof of this remains sparse in humans. Several different rodent-infective Plasmodium species have been employed in in vivo studies of parasite-sensing, experimental cerebral malaria, lethal malaria, liver-stage infection, and adaptive T-cell and B-cell immunity. A range of different outcomes in these studies suggests a delicately balanced, multi-faceted and highly complex role for type I IFN-signalling in malaria. This is perhaps unsurprising given the multiple parasite-sensing pathways that can trigger type I IFN production, the multiple isoforms of IFN-α/β that can be produced by both immune and non-immune cells, the differential effects of acute versus chronic type I IFN production, the role of low level 'tonic' type I IFN-signalling, and that signalling can occur via homodimeric IFNAR1 or heterodimeric IFNAR1/2 receptors. Nevertheless, the data indicate that type I IFN-signalling controls parasite numbers during liver-stage infection, and depending on host-parasite genetics, can be either detrimental or beneficial to the host during blood-stage infection. Furthermore, type I IFN can promote cytotoxic T lymphocyte immune pathology and hinder CD4 T helper cell-dependent immunity during blood-stage infection. Hence, type I IFN-signalling plays highly context-dependent roles in malaria, which can be beneficial or detrimental to the host.
I 型干扰素(IFNs)是一类具有广泛生物学活性的细胞因子,包括抗病毒和免疫调节功能。在这里,我们专注于原生动物寄生虫病疟疾,并研究 I 型 IFN 信号在人类和实验小鼠感染疟原虫中的作用。自 20 世纪 60 年代以来,该领域已有许多研究,但 I 型 IFN 的作用仍没有一个简单的解释。尽管流行病学数据表明 I 型 IFN 在影响疟疾严重程度方面发挥作用,但在人类中,这一功能的证据仍然很少。几种不同的可感染啮齿动物的疟原虫种已被用于寄生虫感应、实验性脑型疟疾、致死性疟疾、肝期感染以及适应性 T 细胞和 B 细胞免疫的体内研究。这些研究中的一系列不同结果表明,I 型 IFN 信号在疟疾中具有微妙平衡、多方面和高度复杂的作用。鉴于可以触发 I 型 IFN 产生的多种寄生虫感应途径、免疫和非免疫细胞都可以产生的 IFN-α/β的多种同工型、急性和慢性 I 型 IFN 产生的不同影响、低水平“持续”I 型 IFN 信号的作用以及信号可以通过同二聚体 IFNAR1 或异二聚体 IFNAR1/2 受体发生,这也许并不奇怪。然而,数据表明 I 型 IFN 信号在肝期感染期间控制寄生虫数量,并且取决于宿主-寄生虫遗传学,在血期感染期间,它可以对宿主有害或有益。此外,I 型 IFN 可以促进细胞毒性 T 淋巴细胞免疫病理,并阻碍 CD4 T 辅助细胞依赖性免疫在血期感染期间。因此,I 型 IFN 信号在疟疾中发挥高度依赖背景的作用,这可能对宿主有益或有害。